“…I Allen, 1983;Bordelon, 1985; Council on Interracial Books for Children, 1979;Dougherty & Engel, 1987;Patten, 1988;Robinson, 1991;Rosenfelt, 1982;Smith, Greenlaw, & Scott, 1987;Todd, 1988. . 5 Bazler & Simonis, 1990;Brush, 1991;Heikkinen, 1978;Potter & Rosser, 1992;Powell & Garcia, 1985;Faylor, 1979;wdlford, l980a, 1980bWhatley, 1989. 6 Blankenship, 1984;Cairns & Inglis, 1989;Feiner & Morgan, 1990;Ferree & Hall, 1990;Fox, 1989;Grambs, 1987;Kirby & Julian, 1981;Lauter, 1985;Lawson, 1990;Morgen & Moran, 1990;Ogren, 1985;Peterson & Kroner, 1992;Shaver, Davis, & Helburn, 1979;Srole, 1990;Sullivan & Bueler, 1988;Tetreault, 1986. It may be argued, in fact, that a textbook in which females less frequently play the roles of sentence subjects and more often the roles of objects of the action of a sentence is sexist, but such an argument would require a more detailed analysis of every instance of gender representation than allowed for by the scope of the present study.…”