1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00650243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wolf-Rayet binaries: Evolutionary causes for their distribution in the Galaxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table II candidate of a black hole; the same holds for the system HD 97950 (f(M) = 0.15). The average height above the galactic plane for the sample = 280 pv which is much larger than the value holding for WR + OB binaries (i.e., 90 pc, Hidayat et al, 1984) and for OB-type stars (Gies and Bolton, 1986). Using this value for the mass of the CC of the suspected binaries listed in Table II and assuming an average inclination angle = 57.3 ~ (thus assuming that the orbits are randomly oriented in space), the table also gives the masses of the WR star in these systems.…”
Section: Wolf-rayet Binariesmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table II candidate of a black hole; the same holds for the system HD 97950 (f(M) = 0.15). The average height above the galactic plane for the sample = 280 pv which is much larger than the value holding for WR + OB binaries (i.e., 90 pc, Hidayat et al, 1984) and for OB-type stars (Gies and Bolton, 1986). Using this value for the mass of the CC of the suspected binaries listed in Table II and assuming an average inclination angle = 57.3 ~ (thus assuming that the orbits are randomly oriented in space), the table also gives the masses of the WR star in these systems.…”
Section: Wolf-rayet Binariesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Using the evolutionary computations of single stars of Maeder and Meynet (1987) and the average Mvi S -Tefr-spectral type-luminosity class calibration of TABLE I The actual mass of a star given its spectral type and luminosity class using the evolutionary tracks with CCO1; the numbers between brackets correspond to evolutionary tracks without CCO (Vanbeveren, 1987) Humphreys and McElroy (1984), Table I gives an average mass-spectral type-luminosity class relation for massive single stars and MCB components. The sample contains at least 4 binaries where observational evidence is present that mass transfer is going on, i.e., AO Cas (a contact system, Hilditch and Bell, 1987), 29 CMa (a semi-detached system with gas streams present, McCluskey et al, 1975), HD 149404 (the most evolved star, an O9Ia, is the less massive component, Massey and14 Cep (Hilditch, 1974). As a general rule it can be stated that non-evolved massive O-type binary components correspond to stars with initial ZAMS mass larger than 20 Mo, whereas the lower mass MCB components correspond to spectral type B0-B2 (V, IV, and III).…”
Section: Non-evolved Massive Close Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our Galaxy, 159 Population I Wolf-Rayet stars are known (van der Hucht et al, 1981;Hidayat et al, 1984). Table I gives the distribution between single WR stars, single WR stars with intrinsic absorption lines, double-line spectroscopic binaries, and single-line spectroscopic binaries.…”
Section: Known Wr Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these tables the absolute visual magnitude M v , the heliocentric distance d, the galactocentric distance r, and the separation from the galactic plane z are from Hidayat et al (1984) and based on the intrinsic parameters given in II).…”
Section: Known Wr Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation