2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-020-00517-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wolf diet and prey selection in Croatia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also suggest the preference of local wolf populations to either wild boar (Muráň Plateau NP) or red deer (Poloniny NP), while roe deer was always avoided i.e., being less consumed than its availability. These findings support the idea that wolf diet might vary depending on the environmental context, which contradicts previous works showing that wolves hunt the most abundant prey as in Poland [ 87 ], Romania [ 6 , 88 ], Italy [ 82 , 89 ], Spain [ 86 ] and Croatia [ 21 ]. However, wolf diet during summer might be different because in other parts of the Carpathians, high consumption of wild boar has been observed in winter but dropped considerably during summer [ 48 , 90 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results also suggest the preference of local wolf populations to either wild boar (Muráň Plateau NP) or red deer (Poloniny NP), while roe deer was always avoided i.e., being less consumed than its availability. These findings support the idea that wolf diet might vary depending on the environmental context, which contradicts previous works showing that wolves hunt the most abundant prey as in Poland [ 87 ], Romania [ 6 , 88 ], Italy [ 82 , 89 ], Spain [ 86 ] and Croatia [ 21 ]. However, wolf diet during summer might be different because in other parts of the Carpathians, high consumption of wild boar has been observed in winter but dropped considerably during summer [ 48 , 90 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Despite the general geographic pattern in wolf diet throughout Europe, wolf may show local adaptations to other prey species depending on the availability of prey [ 19 , 20 ] and environmental conditions [ 21 , 22 ]. For example, opportunistic predators living in multiple prey systems tend to select the most abundant prey ( apostatic selection ) [ 23 ], and the pattern of selection is influenced by changes in prey availability [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also suggest the preference of local wolf populations to either wild boar (in Muráň Plateau NP) or red deer (in Poloniny NP), while roe deer was always avoided, being less consumed than its availability. These findings support the idea that wolf diet might vary depending on the environmental context, which contradicts previous works showing that wolves hunt the most abundant prey as in Poland [87], Romania [6,88], Italy [82,89], Spain [86] and Croatia [21]. However, wolf diet during summer might be different because in other parts of the Carpathians, high consumption of wild boar has been observed in winter but dropped considerably during summer [48,90].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…In this context, wolf damage to livestock production, as well as wolf depredation on hunting game species, is a constant source of conflict regarding coexistence with human activities [16][17][18]. Despite the general geographic pattern in wolf diet throughout Europe, wolf may show local adaptations to other prey species depending on the availability of prey [19] [20] and environmental conditions [21,22]. For example, opportunistic predators living in multiple prey systems tend to select the most abundant prey (apostatic selection) [23], and the pattern of selection is influenced by changes in prey availability [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study adds further support for the west‐east population structure of Dinaric‐Balkan wolves, as previously observed for various taxa across the Balkans (e.g., Djan et al, 2014 ; Glasnović et al, 2018 ; Šnjegota et al, 2018 ; Sotiropoulos et al, 2007 ; Ursenbacher et al, 2008 ; Veličković et al, 2015 ). Numerous factors may contribute to the observed structure, and demographic history, landscape type, prey selection, wolf–dog hybridization, environmental, and ecological factors have all been reported to influence wolf population structure in Europe, North America, and Asia (e.g., Czarnomska et al, 2013 ; Djan et al, 2014 ; Jędrzejewski et al, 2012 ; Koblmüller et al, 2016 ; Kusak et al, 2000 ; Muñoz‐Fuentes et al, 2009 ; Octenjak et al, 2020 ; Pilot et al, 2006 , 2012 ; Schweizer et al, 2016 ; Stronen et al, 2015 ; Werhahn et al, 2018 ; vonHoldt et al, 2010 ). Furthermore, recent findings from wolves indicate that functional genetic variation can be linked to important environmental factors such as temperature, precipitation (Schweizer et al, 2016 ), and elevation (Werhahn et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%