2018 IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Computing (ICCC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iccc.2018.00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(WKSP) On the Potential of Data Extraction by Detecting Unaware Facial Recognition with Brain-Computer Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is essential to differentiate between specific technologies, their costs, and their benefits. (Bellman et al, 2018) On the potential of data extraction by detecting unaware facial recognition with brain-computer interfaces…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it is essential to differentiate between specific technologies, their costs, and their benefits. (Bellman et al, 2018) On the potential of data extraction by detecting unaware facial recognition with brain-computer interfaces…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the alteration or attack of the EEG signal during the transmission of the wireless BCI, Bhalerao et al (2020) introduce a security lock-in between the EEG recording system and the processing system. Bellman et al (2018) studied as attackers can obtain private information from individuals without their consent using modern consumergrade BCI devices based on the level of recognition a victim has of a specific face. For example, Gladden (2016) proposed a conceptual framework neuroprosthetic devices (sensory, cognitive, and motor neuroprostheses), utilized for the treatment of medical conditions or purposes of human enhancement.…”
Section: Cyberattacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this year there were five studies assessing the capabilities of EPOC. These studies assessed the accuracy of P300 identification [6], the validity of affect signatures [7], and whether EPOC could be used to collect valid ERPs [8,29,30]. Another five EPOC validation studies were published in 2014 before peaking in 2015 (n = 7) and then declining in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 (n = 4, n = 4, n = 3, and n = 3, respectively).…”
Section: Fig 2 Number Of Epoc Studies By Type From 2010 To 2019 Stamentioning
confidence: 99%