1974
DOI: 10.1029/gm018p0508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WKB approximation in application to acoustic-gravity waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
95
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that particular study, the waves considered had shorter horizontal wavelengths than those considered here, and were therefore more likely to be ducted because their vertical wavelengths were not so large as those considered here. In contrast to the results discussed here, strong reflection was generally obtained for a range of wave parameters in the work of Hickey [Einaudi and Hines, 1971 ]. We obtain values of R (not shown) which never exceed 0.9 and 1.8 for the W2000 and Z93 waves, respectively (using our nominal winds profiles), implying that the WKB approximation may be a reasonable approximation for the W2000 wave and that it may be a bad approximation for the Z93 wave.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…In that particular study, the waves considered had shorter horizontal wavelengths than those considered here, and were therefore more likely to be ducted because their vertical wavelengths were not so large as those considered here. In contrast to the results discussed here, strong reflection was generally obtained for a range of wave parameters in the work of Hickey [Einaudi and Hines, 1971 ]. We obtain values of R (not shown) which never exceed 0.9 and 1.8 for the W2000 and Z93 waves, respectively (using our nominal winds profiles), implying that the WKB approximation may be a reasonable approximation for the W2000 wave and that it may be a bad approximation for the Z93 wave.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…If the spectral characteristics of the GW source and the background state are known, ray tracing can be a useful tool for studying the propagation of GWs and their influence on the background atmosphere (Jones, 1969;Schoeberl, 1985;Marks and Eckermann, 1995;Ding et al, 2003;VF05;VF06;Broutman and Eckermann, 2012;. Ray tracing is applicable for nonbreaking, small amplitude GWs which propagate in slowly varying background atmospheres (Einaudi and Hines, 1970;VF05). Its can also be applied to the large-amplitude GWs after properly including a scheme to parameterize the effects of GW saturation and/or breaking (Marks and Eckermann, 1995;Vadas and Crowley, 2010;.…”
Section: Liu Et Al: the Momentum Deposition Of Small Amplitude Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its can also be applied to the large-amplitude GWs after properly including a scheme to parameterize the effects of GW saturation and/or breaking (Marks and Eckermann, 1995;Vadas and Crowley, 2010;. It is important to note that the theoretical basis for ray tracing is the WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) method, which requires the variation of the background atmosphere to be slow relative to the GW vertical wavelength (Pitteway and Hines, 1963;Einaudi and Hines, 1970;Nappo, 2002). For example, in a constant-wind (dissipative) thermosphere, the slowly varying background assumption requires λ z ≤ 4πH (VF05; Vadas, 2007).…”
Section: Liu Et Al: the Momentum Deposition Of Small Amplitude Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravity waves considered in the present study are within those wavelengths, and we found that a relaxation of the mid-frequency approximation does not change the results (not shown). In order to examine the validity of the WKB approximation, we checked whether the present gravity waves satisfy the criterion of δ ≡ m zz /2 m 3 − 3 m z /4 m 4 1 proposed by Einaudi and Hines (1970). For a dominant wave in our case (a zonal wave with a phase speed of 10 m s −1 ), the maximum value of δ is about 0.26, which is comfortably less than unity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%