1985
DOI: 10.2307/27508732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wives and Property. Reform of the Married Women's Property Law in Nineteenth Century England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through much of human history, slaves were bought and sold like property; 76 indigenous peoples were compared to animals roaming the land, justifying their dispossession; 77 and for centuries under English law, Blackstone's summary of the position of women held that 'husband and wife are one person, and the husband is that person'. 78 Even today, natural persons enjoy plenary rights and obligations only if they are adults, of sound mind, and not incarcerated.…”
Section: Natural Personality: Cogito Ergo Sum?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through much of human history, slaves were bought and sold like property; 76 indigenous peoples were compared to animals roaming the land, justifying their dispossession; 77 and for centuries under English law, Blackstone's summary of the position of women held that 'husband and wife are one person, and the husband is that person'. 78 Even today, natural persons enjoy plenary rights and obligations only if they are adults, of sound mind, and not incarcerated.…”
Section: Natural Personality: Cogito Ergo Sum?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in rare cases of abuse or neglect were divorces granted to women, and these women faced difficult futures, without individual legal identity or control over their property or earnings. The act of marriage made a woman the property and responsibility of her husband, otherwise referred to as "coverture" (Holcombe, 1983;Horstman, 1985). Among the many ramifications of their coverture, women could not represent themselves in court and had no standing to initiate divorce proceedings.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Divorcementioning
confidence: 99%