IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2011.6160829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Witsenhausen's counterexample: A view from optimal transport theory

Abstract: Abstract-We formulate Witsenhausen's counterexample in stochastic control as an optimization problem involving the quadratic Wasserstein distance and the minimum mean-square error. Classical results are recovered as immediate consequences of transport-theoretic properties. New results and bounds on the optimal cost are also obtained. In particular, we show that the optimal controller is a strictly increasing function with a real analytic left inverse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As k reaches 0.4-0.6 the step behavior of the output appears. This particular value of k where the system changes from being affine to have a more general shape is consistent with a result in [23], which states that the optimal cost is less than the optimal cost for an affine system if k < 0.564. Depending on the realization of the Monte-Carlo samples we get either a 3.5-step mapping or a 4-step mapping as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As k reaches 0.4-0.6 the step behavior of the output appears. This particular value of k where the system changes from being affine to have a more general shape is consistent with a result in [23], which states that the optimal cost is less than the optimal cost for an affine system if k < 0.564. Depending on the realization of the Monte-Carlo samples we get either a 3.5-step mapping or a 4-step mapping as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is Witsenhausen's counterexample [4]. For this problem, Witsenhausen established that a solution exists (we note that Wu and Verdu provided an alternative proof using tools from Transportation theory [26]), and established that an optimal policy is non-linear.…”
Section: We Wish To Minimize E[(x −X)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When applied to the special case of spatially invariant systems, the controller still needs to be able to receive information faster than the plant can propagate its inputs over any given distance, analogous to (26), and the triangle inequality (25) discussed above becomes a condition that the support function imposed on the controller needs to be subadditive. This includes funnel causal systems, developed in the study of convexity for these problems [84].…”
Section: E Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existence of optimal policies for static and a class of sequential dynamic teams have been studied recently in [30]. More specific setups and non-existence results have been studied in [59], [55], [62] and [61]. Existence of optimal team policies has been established in [20] for a class of continuous-time decentralized stochastic control problems.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%