2002
DOI: 10.1353/sub.2002.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Witnessing Woyzeck: Theatricality and the Empowerment of the Spectator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Freddie Rokem notes, this kind of meta-spectatorship prompts audiences to register their own spectatorship. 76 More importantly, it draws attention to the spectatorial gaze per se. For Rau, 'The question of the gaze, the human, the divine, and the view of the camera, is the real fundamental question of Mitleid.'…”
Section: Sipérius and The Gazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Freddie Rokem notes, this kind of meta-spectatorship prompts audiences to register their own spectatorship. 76 More importantly, it draws attention to the spectatorial gaze per se. For Rau, 'The question of the gaze, the human, the divine, and the view of the camera, is the real fundamental question of Mitleid.'…”
Section: Sipérius and The Gazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also considered the ethical concerns of our project in relation to concepts of witnessing as informed by Etchells (1999), Schaefer (2003), Wake (2008) and Rokem (2000Rokem ( , 2002. Etchells believes that the role of contemporary theatre is to produce witnesses rather than spectators so that an audience is 'unable to stop thinking, talking and reporting on what [they've] seen ' (1999: 18).…”
Section: Ethical Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%