2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01800.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Witnessing Intimate Partner Violence as a Child Does Not Increase the Likelihood of Becoming an Adult Intimate Partner Violence Victim

Abstract: Adults who witnessed IPV as children were more likely to have a lower income, be younger, and have been abused as a child, but not more likely to be positive for ongoing IPV, when compared with patients who had not witnessed IPV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates that experiencing these traumas significantly increase the likelihood of perpetrating child abuse (Cunningham, 2003) and partner violence later in life (Ehrensaft et al, 2003;Stith et al, 2000;Swinford, DeMaris, Cernkovich, & Giordano, 2000;White & Widom, 2003;Wolfe, Wekerle, Scott, Straatman, & Grasley, 2004). However, some work indicates null effects, raising some doubts about the key assumptions of the cycle of violence (Ernst et al, 2007;Fergusson, Boden, & Horwood, 2006). For instance, using a prospective, longitudinal design of a New Zealand birth cohort, Fergusson et al (2006) found that while controlling for many social and contextual factors missing from previous studies, childhood exposure to partner violence did not increase the risk of being a perpetrator or a victim of partner violence.…”
Section: The Cycle Of Violence: the Impact Of Maltreatment On Offendingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Research indicates that experiencing these traumas significantly increase the likelihood of perpetrating child abuse (Cunningham, 2003) and partner violence later in life (Ehrensaft et al, 2003;Stith et al, 2000;Swinford, DeMaris, Cernkovich, & Giordano, 2000;White & Widom, 2003;Wolfe, Wekerle, Scott, Straatman, & Grasley, 2004). However, some work indicates null effects, raising some doubts about the key assumptions of the cycle of violence (Ernst et al, 2007;Fergusson, Boden, & Horwood, 2006). For instance, using a prospective, longitudinal design of a New Zealand birth cohort, Fergusson et al (2006) found that while controlling for many social and contextual factors missing from previous studies, childhood exposure to partner violence did not increase the risk of being a perpetrator or a victim of partner violence.…”
Section: The Cycle Of Violence: the Impact Of Maltreatment On Offendingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, a retrospective study of 280 emergency department patients, a third of whom had reported witnessing family violence as children, did not show a significant association between a history of exposure to violence and present involvement in a violent dating relationship (Ernst et al, 2007). Another group of researchers questioned previous findings on the lasting effects of exposure to family violence in a large longitudinal study of children from New Zealand, concluding that the effects of childhood exposure to family violence on later interpersonal violence were statistically weak (Fergusson, Boden, & Horwood, 2006).…”
Section: Impact Of Exposure To Family Violence On Children’s Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no validated tools to screen for ACWs. In our previous study, we used a single question; in another, the WOVAT four-question scale was based on the OVAT (6,7). For the present study, we used the single question and a four-question scale we created, based on the OVAT, and named it the WOVAT (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For adults witnessing abuse as children (ACW), we used the following single question from our previous study: ''Did you witness violence between your parents/ stepparents as a child?'' as our standard, with the fourquestion WOVAT scale used to confirm its construct validity (6,7). For perpetration of IPV, we used the PAPS as our standard (16).…”
Section: Phase 2 -Perps Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation