2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603346113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Witnessing entanglement without entanglement witness operators

Abstract: Quantum mechanics predicts the existence of correlations between composite systems that, although puzzling to our physical intuition, enable technologies not accessible in a classical world. Notwithstanding, there is still no efficient general method to theoretically quantify and experimentally detect entanglement of many qubits. Here we propose to detect entanglement by measuring the statistical response of a quantum system to an arbitrary nonlocal parametric evolution. We witness entanglement without relying… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis suggests a way that could be used for steady-state entanglement across all subsystems, which could be verified by calculating an n-partite entanglement witness [54][55][56][57][58]. Since the ME, given in Eq.…”
Section: General Case: Master Equations For N-qubit Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This analysis suggests a way that could be used for steady-state entanglement across all subsystems, which could be verified by calculating an n-partite entanglement witness [54][55][56][57][58]. Since the ME, given in Eq.…”
Section: General Case: Master Equations For N-qubit Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The QFI has an appealing operational meaning in terms of statistical speed of quantum states under external parametric transformations [44,45], it extends the class of states detectable by popular methods such as the spin squeezing [40,44,[52][53][54], and it can witness entanglement in spin systems [37,47,55] as well as in free-fermion topological models [48,49]. Furthermore, the QFI can be extracted experimentally using a statistical distance method [44,45], or by a weighted integral of the dynamic susceptibility across the full spectrum [37]. Measurable lower bound to the QFI has been extacted experimen-tally [44,53,54] see also Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical developments and experimental investigations have, so far, mostly focussed on the estimation of single phase [1][2][3], for which the ultimate sensitivity bounds and explicit conditions for their saturation are well known [4,5]. These studies have been further extended in order to understand the connection between enhancement in phase estimation and particle entanglement [6][7][8][9], as well as the impact of noise and dissipation on the fundamental bounds [10,11]. Several proof-of-principle experiments have demonstrated phase estimation below the classical (shot-noise) limit [2], including applications in fields as diverse as magnetometry [12], atomic clocks [13] and optical detection of gravitational waves [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%