2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00809-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-yard habitat use by white-tailed deer at varying winter severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These yards offer particular factors (i.e. dense cover) that effectively reduce snow depths as well as providing thermal protection and shelter (Morrison et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These yards offer particular factors (i.e. dense cover) that effectively reduce snow depths as well as providing thermal protection and shelter (Morrison et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in line with Mysterud et al [38], who also found roe deer avoiding open habitats in winter. Similarly, under high snow conditions, browse availability was found to be less important for relative patch use of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) [39,40], and only shelter-related features were predictive of variation in habitat use [40]. Animals preferred higher canopy cover when it was cold compared to average temperatures or when snow heights of our reference weather station exceeded 60 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…CARTs are becoming increasingly common for addressing a variety of ecological issues such as predicting species occurrence (De'ath and Fabricius 2000; Morrison et al 2003), age classification (classified as young-of-theyear, juveniles, or adults; Karels et al 2004), survival (survived or died;Franken 2002), and the response of populations to climate variability (Crozier and Zabel 2006). In essence, classification trees are a regression technique that allows the use of categorical and continuous data, nonlinear relationships, missing values, and implicitly include interactions among predictor variables (Faraway 2006).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%