2023
DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.2022-0177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-Subject Variability and the Influence of Exercise Training History on the Resting Plasma Metabolome in Men

Abstract: This study investigated within-subject variability in the circulating metabolome under controlled conditions, and whether divergent exercise training backgrounds were associated with alterations in the circulating metabolome assessed in resting samples. Thirty-seven men comprising of endurance athletes (END; body mass, 71.0 ± 6.8 kg; fat-free mass index, 16.9 ± 1.1 kg/m2), strength athletes (STR; 94.5 ± 8.8 kg; 23.0 ± 1.8 kg/m2), and recreationally active controls (CON; 77.6 ± 7.7 kg; 18.1 ± 1.0 kg/m2) provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Male participants ( n = 38) who were recreationally active controls (CON; n = 12), endurance‐trained (END; n = 13) or strength‐trained (STR; n = 13) were recruited for this study as described in detail previously (Darragh et al., 2023). That study investigated within‐subject variability in the circulating metabolome under controlled conditions and whether divergent exercise training backgrounds were associated with alterations in the circulating metabolome assessed in resting samples (Darragh et al., 2023), yet the present study is an entirely separate analysis of those samples focused on small EVs. Based on the recently proposed participant classification framework (McKay et al., 2022), END was comprised of n = 8 tier 3/highly trained athletes and n = 5 tier 4/elite athletes, whereas STR was comprised of n = 9 tier 3/highly trained athletes and n = 4 tier 4/elite athletes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Male participants ( n = 38) who were recreationally active controls (CON; n = 12), endurance‐trained (END; n = 13) or strength‐trained (STR; n = 13) were recruited for this study as described in detail previously (Darragh et al., 2023). That study investigated within‐subject variability in the circulating metabolome under controlled conditions and whether divergent exercise training backgrounds were associated with alterations in the circulating metabolome assessed in resting samples (Darragh et al., 2023), yet the present study is an entirely separate analysis of those samples focused on small EVs. Based on the recently proposed participant classification framework (McKay et al., 2022), END was comprised of n = 8 tier 3/highly trained athletes and n = 5 tier 4/elite athletes, whereas STR was comprised of n = 9 tier 3/highly trained athletes and n = 4 tier 4/elite athletes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants arrived at the laboratory on two separate occasions (termed visit 1 and visit 2) under controlled conditions. Participants were provided with standardised meals (30 kcal/kg as 50%/25%/25% for carbohydrate, protein and fat; GourmetFuel, Dublin, Ireland) for consumption on the day before each visit, were asked to abstain from alcohol consumption for at least 24 h, arrived after an overnight fast and only having consumed water that morning and were asked to abstain from exercise for at least 24 h before the visit (Darragh et al., 2023). Participants lay supine for 10 min before a venous blood sample was taken from a superficial forearm vein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the recently proposed Participant Classification Framework (McKay et al., 2022 ), END comprised n = 8 tier 3/highly trained athletes and n = 5 tier 4/elite athletes, and STR comprised n = 9 tier 3/highly trained athletes and n = 4 tier 4/elite athletes. The phenotypic and performance characteristics of these participants are detailed extensively elsewhere (Darragh et al., 2023 ). Briefly, the STR participants’ recent one repetition maximum (1RM) in the squat exercise was 228 ± 30 kg, and the END participants’ recent 5‐km personal best was 16:30 ± 1:22 min:s. The CON participants were recreationally active (tier 2 of the Participant Classification Framework), but did not engage in any form of structured exercise training and self‐reported being unable to achieve a squat 1RM of >140 kg, or a 5‐km time of < 25:00 min:s. This study received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of Dublin City University (DCUREC/2021/079) and conformed to the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki , except for registration in a trials database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%