2016
DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-subject Pooling of Biological Samples to Reduce Exposure Misclassification in Biomarker-based Studies

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
190
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
190
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the induced sensitivity loss was consistent across all methods and did not help in further discriminating the statistical methods under investigation. Importantly, we did not consider measurement error or misclassification in exposure covariates, although they have a potentially large impact on statistical power and bias, particularly in the case of classical type error (de Klerk et al 1989; Perrier et al 2016; Rappaport et al 1995). As a result, method performance may be hampered in real-life situations, but there is no a priori reason to think that the statistical methods investigated in this study would be differentially affected by these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the induced sensitivity loss was consistent across all methods and did not help in further discriminating the statistical methods under investigation. Importantly, we did not consider measurement error or misclassification in exposure covariates, although they have a potentially large impact on statistical power and bias, particularly in the case of classical type error (de Klerk et al 1989; Perrier et al 2016; Rappaport et al 1995). As a result, method performance may be hampered in real-life situations, but there is no a priori reason to think that the statistical methods investigated in this study would be differentially affected by these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help reduce exposure variability, we averaged 16- and 26-week maternal urinary BPA concentrations to estimate prenatal exposure, but we only have one measurement at each postnatal visit to reflect approximately year-long exposures. Future studies might consider pooling multiple urine samples from each individual and analyzing the pooled sample to reduce the potential for exposure misclassification bias (Perrier et al 2016). Our sample size was modest, which reduced our ability to precisely estimate associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings underscore the importance of collecting more than a single biospecimen for the analytes that had poor to good reliability, to characterize true exposure for those analytes at the lower range of sensitivity for analyses where correct categorization of exposure is important. Although BP-3, BP-1, TCS, 2,4-DCP, BuP, and PrP exhibited excellent reliability; measurement error from comparable levels of reliability can bias effect estimates (Perrier et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%