2000
DOI: 10.4141/p98-139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-season grass yield and nitrogen uptake, and soil nitrogen as affected by nitrogen applied at various rates and distributions in a high rainfall environment

Abstract: S. 2000. Within-season grass yield and nitrogen uptake, and soil nitrogen as affected by nitrogen applied at various rates and distributions in a high rainfall environment. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80: 287-301. A study was conducted to assess the effect of rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer, and to compare the effectiveness of single and split applications of N on yield and quality of forage grass and on the potential for nitrate leaching. Three field trials were conducted at different sites in successive years, with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trial 1 was previously shown to be the least yield responsive of the three trials over the whole season to N application rate (Bittman and Kowalenko 1998). The response of crude-protein-N to applied N also varied from cut to cut similar to the variable magnitude of yield responses previously reported (Kowalenko and Bittman 2000). However, the magnitude of the response of yield differed from that of crude-protein-N. For example, yield in Trial 1 tended to respond toward the end of the growing season, whereas crude-protein-N was increased only in cut 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Trial 1 was previously shown to be the least yield responsive of the three trials over the whole season to N application rate (Bittman and Kowalenko 1998). The response of crude-protein-N to applied N also varied from cut to cut similar to the variable magnitude of yield responses previously reported (Kowalenko and Bittman 2000). However, the magnitude of the response of yield differed from that of crude-protein-N. For example, yield in Trial 1 tended to respond toward the end of the growing season, whereas crude-protein-N was increased only in cut 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The current study showed that crop crude-protein-and nitrate-N response to N application varies considerably with cut over the growing season. Factors such as residual effects from previous fertilizer applications (Kowalenko and Bittman 2000) plus changes in soil N mineralization and crop growth as influenced by weather conditions (Kowalenko et al 1989) may account for some of the changes as the season progresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, although the benefits of nutrient application to forage lands adapted to high moisture conditions (e.g., the Aspen Parkland or Boreal regions) have been relatively well established (e.g., Nuttall et al 1991;Bittman et al 1997;Kowalenko and Bittman 2000), specific information on fertilizer application to semi-arid rangeland and adjacent tame pasture (e.g., the Mixedgrass region) is less common (McCaughey and Simons 1996a). Intensive forage management, including the application of manure, is generally uncommon in semi-arid regions, including on native rangelands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%