2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2013.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-laboratory and between-laboratory variability in the measurement of anti-müllerian hormone determined within an external quality assurance scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, Gen II AMH assays should be used making comparing values obtained with current literature more relevant. However, even with the same Gen II assay, a wide range of average values were still reported by Zuvela et al [32]. One of the principle concerns is the effects of storage conditions varying from laboratory to laboratory resulted in the variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As discussed above, Gen II AMH assays should be used making comparing values obtained with current literature more relevant. However, even with the same Gen II assay, a wide range of average values were still reported by Zuvela et al [32]. One of the principle concerns is the effects of storage conditions varying from laboratory to laboratory resulted in the variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In fresh serum, AMH concentrations appear to increase progressively at room temperature with the ACTIVE AMH gen II ELISA kit (Beckman‐Coulter) . All AMH estimates in our study were analyzed in frozen samples at the same laboratory and the median time before analysis was 6 days, which minimizes the risk of false values . Regarding limitations, although we found great variation in AFCs, the increase in AFC at the 6‐month post‐surgery visit in the 19 women investigated is also an interesting finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It has also been questioned whether the laboratory methodology used to detect AMH in in vitro fertilization practice is robust. In a recent study, Zuvela et al . sought to determine whether there was variability among ten different laboratories in the measurement of AMH using the same assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%