2001
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.2001.1538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-crown Foliar Plasticity of Western Hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla, in Relation to Stand Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Holland and Richardson (2009) reported that stomatal density and guard cell length are both sensitive to environmental conditions and that considerable genotypic variation and phenotypic plasticity occurred in these traits, our study showed that differences among provenances in regards to guard cell length were not statistically significant, despite the decrease of L A in dry year for all provenances (Table 2). This is in agreement with the results presented by other authors, who found that stomatal density appears to be relatively plastic compared to stomatal length (Richardson et al 2001) and therefore, potentially adaptive to environmental change (Lake and Woodward 2008). Our study also showed that stomatal density increased with drought, which is consistent with the results obtained in some other plant species (Klooster and Palmer-Young 2004;Fraser et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although Holland and Richardson (2009) reported that stomatal density and guard cell length are both sensitive to environmental conditions and that considerable genotypic variation and phenotypic plasticity occurred in these traits, our study showed that differences among provenances in regards to guard cell length were not statistically significant, despite the decrease of L A in dry year for all provenances (Table 2). This is in agreement with the results presented by other authors, who found that stomatal density appears to be relatively plastic compared to stomatal length (Richardson et al 2001) and therefore, potentially adaptive to environmental change (Lake and Woodward 2008). Our study also showed that stomatal density increased with drought, which is consistent with the results obtained in some other plant species (Klooster and Palmer-Young 2004;Fraser et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The relative trait range or RTR index is determined from the difference in a trait value of a population in an environment expected to produce a higher trait value compared to that in an environment expected to produce a lower trait value, relative to the maximum value of all populations in both environments (Richardson et al 2001). Positive values indicate the difference is in the direction expected and the magnitude of the value indicates the extent of trait variation (or sensitivity of response).…”
Section: Relative Trait Range Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transplant experiments can also reveal the extent to which a species can elicit a range of phenotypes (as measured via the relative trait range or RTR) in response to different environmental conditions and how this response relates to an environmental variable (Richardson et al 2001). In general terms, the RTR index uses an expectation that the response of a population will be higher in one environment than another and is expressed relative to the maximum response of all populations in both environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to predict the responses of plant communities to environmental change, it is necessary to assess the relative contribution of intraspecific variation and species replacement in variations in functional traits (Kichenin et al 2013). In most previous studies, intraspecific variation has been considered to be far less important than species replacement (Albert et al 2011, Richardson et al 2001. However, recent studies have shown that this assumption is not always met (Lecerf & Chauvet 2008, Messier et al 2010, and increasing evidence has demonstrated that intraspecific variation actually plays a crucial role in community composition (Cornwell & Ackerly 2009, Jung et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%