1976
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330450337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within and between race distances in population studies based on discrete traits of the human skull

Abstract: A battery of 24 discrete cranial traits has been tested for its power to discriminate within- and between-race distances for the two principal North American indigenous populations: Indian (7 samples, N = 366) and Eskimo (7 samples, N = 451). One of the Indian samples, Dakota Sioux, has been split according to tribal subdivisions, the intra-tribal mean distance providing a parameter of very close relationship. In addition, two Negro samples provide a parameter of relationship phylogenetically remote from the A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laughlin and Jørgensen, 1956;Yamaguchi, 1967;Berry and Berry, 1967;Dodo, 1974;Ossenberg, 1976). The findings of the present study suggest that these non-metric cranial traits might be used effectively even for population studies of juveniles, such as the children of prehistoric Jomon and Yayoi in Japan.…”
Section: Comparison Of Trait Frequencies Between Children and Adultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Laughlin and Jørgensen, 1956;Yamaguchi, 1967;Berry and Berry, 1967;Dodo, 1974;Ossenberg, 1976). The findings of the present study suggest that these non-metric cranial traits might be used effectively even for population studies of juveniles, such as the children of prehistoric Jomon and Yayoi in Japan.…”
Section: Comparison Of Trait Frequencies Between Children and Adultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Data for adults of both sexes were pooled and for certain features juvenile data also were included. Descriptions of the features and criteria for selecting and scoring them have been documented in earlier reports (Ossenberg, 1970(Ossenberg, , 1976(Ossenberg, , 1994(Ossenberg, , 2004; however, brief explanatory notes concerning certain features may be useful here.…”
Section: Cranial Nonmetric Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies examined relationships between widely divergent populations (e.g., Corruccini, 1974;Ossenberg, 1976;Pietrusewsky, 1984) although the majority have been regional studies of closely related populations, usually within a single major group (e.g., Ossenberg, 1969;Kellock and Parsons, 1970;Molto, 1983;Konigsberg, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%