2016
DOI: 10.1017/s147474641600049x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wither Social Citizenship? Lived Experiences of Citizenship In/Exclusion for Recipients of Out-of-Work Benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This created a deep distrust in the system (see also Marks et al 2017). This study supports the findings of many researchers in this area, including those who found that the assessment processes may be viewed as not empathetic (Clifton et al 2013;Dwyer et al 2016) and as dehumanising (Allen et al 2016;Patrick 2017;Dwyer et al 2016), intimidating (Shefer et al 2016) and depersonalising (Garthwaite 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This created a deep distrust in the system (see also Marks et al 2017). This study supports the findings of many researchers in this area, including those who found that the assessment processes may be viewed as not empathetic (Clifton et al 2013;Dwyer et al 2016) and as dehumanising (Allen et al 2016;Patrick 2017;Dwyer et al 2016), intimidating (Shefer et al 2016) and depersonalising (Garthwaite 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this study, people who have been subject to recent changes to their disability benefits described their contact with the DWP benefits system as dehumanising, with the incomprehensibility, unpredictability and unreliability of the process leading to pervasive worry, fear and stress (Patrick 2017;Wright 2016). This created a deep distrust in the system (see also Marks et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent reforms in these two Chinese societies also illustrate the discussion of welfare as rights, deservingness and conditionality (Laenan, 2020; Patrick, 2017), and had different outcomes: In Taiwan, there was a minor reform to the public service pension; in Hong Kong, the private MPF schemes remain in place, and only supplemented by an additional mean‐tested social assistance scheme. In both societies, generational interests seem to have informed the policy debates on the basis and extent of provisions.…”
Section: The Debate On Retirement Protection In Taiwan and Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is one of “dissolving the bonds of social solidarity” 10 as a denuded sense of citizenship is created in those subjected to moral distancing. 11,12 The second concerns the way moral distance allows the state to step aside from what had previously been seen as part of its welfare responsibilities. A new quasi-state welfare apparatus emerges which is designed to outsource welfare and, in so doing, reduce the welfare bill.…”
Section: The Medical and The Moralmentioning
confidence: 99%