2012
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xxxix-b7-51-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Withdrawn Paper

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In order to determine the absolute accuracy of SRMT model on Polish area the research work has been performed on the basis of reference terrain profiles measured by GPS technique. The flat and hilly terrains were examined in administrative borders of fourteen provinces. It was not reference data for mountainous terrains. For the analysis of accuracy of the SRTM model 332 terrain profiles and 29,308 points have been measured. The accuracy of SRTM model presented by RMSE was computed on the basic of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute horizontal accuracy of SRTM data is 20 m (circular error at 90 % confidence) and the absolute as well as relative vertical accuracy is less than 16 m (linear error at 90 % confidence) and 10 m, respectively (USGS, 2006;Kellndorfer et al, 2004). Previous studies on SRTM (Zielinski and Chimel, 2007;Karwel and Ewiak, 2008;Hanson et al, 2011;Roger et al, 2013;Løvholt et al, 2012;Taubenböck et al, 2008) report that these data sets perform better than their standard specification and hence can be used for a variety of applications, such as coastal vulnerability or inundation mapping. In our analysis, the aim of using DEM is to evaluate and separate the lowest area from other higher areas along the coasts for which the SRTM data proves sufficient with its specifications.…”
Section: Regional Elevationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The absolute horizontal accuracy of SRTM data is 20 m (circular error at 90 % confidence) and the absolute as well as relative vertical accuracy is less than 16 m (linear error at 90 % confidence) and 10 m, respectively (USGS, 2006;Kellndorfer et al, 2004). Previous studies on SRTM (Zielinski and Chimel, 2007;Karwel and Ewiak, 2008;Hanson et al, 2011;Roger et al, 2013;Løvholt et al, 2012;Taubenböck et al, 2008) report that these data sets perform better than their standard specification and hence can be used for a variety of applications, such as coastal vulnerability or inundation mapping. In our analysis, the aim of using DEM is to evaluate and separate the lowest area from other higher areas along the coasts for which the SRTM data proves sufficient with its specifications.…”
Section: Regional Elevationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Either data that allow generating terrain model are necessary, or ready models can be used. SRTM model is available for the entire Earth, which comes in a horizontal resolution of 3 arc seconds and has required vertical accuracy of about 16 meters [8].…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mukul et al (2017) avaliaram a acurácia vertical do SRTM para a região peninsular e do Himalaia indiano, utilizando 220 pontos de verificação obtidos por GPS (Global Positioning System) de alta precisão. Outras validações regionais do SRTM também foram realizadas na India, Tailândia & Estados Unidos, Polônia, Grécia e no Brasil (Agrawal et al, 2006;Gorokhovich & Voustianiouk, 2006;Karwel & Ewiak, 2008;Mouratidis et al, 2010;Marini et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified