1998
DOI: 10.1002/lt.500040309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver allograft recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, classical induction therapy with long‐term steroid therapy is inadvisable for low‐risk liver transplantation recipients, given the efficacy of immunosuppressive regimens based on tacrolimus, mycophenolate or sirolimus, and the risk of infections and malignancies 1. With reduction of the incidence of early acute rejection and without any relevant associated toxicity, monoclonal antibodies against IL‐2Rab receptor offer the possibility of a more selective immunosuppression 10–12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, classical induction therapy with long‐term steroid therapy is inadvisable for low‐risk liver transplantation recipients, given the efficacy of immunosuppressive regimens based on tacrolimus, mycophenolate or sirolimus, and the risk of infections and malignancies 1. With reduction of the incidence of early acute rejection and without any relevant associated toxicity, monoclonal antibodies against IL‐2Rab receptor offer the possibility of a more selective immunosuppression 10–12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are well‐known side effects that result in significant morbidities, including hypertension, obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and infectious complications. Previous reports have shown that early reduction or elimination of corticosteroids could significantly reduce the incidence of many of these complications in liver transplant recipients 1–3. However, there is a significant risk of increased incidence of acute rejection associated with early steroid withdrawal that may require treatment with high doses of pulse steroids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steroid-free immunosuppression may reduce opportunistic infections and malignancies in already immunocompromised children with hepatoblastoma due to reiterated preoperative chemotherapy (20,21). There is no difference among the type of immunosuppression received in post-transplant tumor recurrence, and the potential benefits of steroid-free immunosuppression on hepatoblastoma recurrence require further evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebrocardiovascular events are a major cause of longterm morbidity and mortality in these patients, and the contribution of immunosuppression to posttransplantation diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia is well established. [1][2][3][4][5] Munoz et al 6 noted an increased cardiovascular risk index in long-term survivors after OLT that was attributed to obesity and hypercholesterolemia. We previously reported improvement in glucose control, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia in patients undergoing corticosteroid withdrawal greater than 1 year after OLT.…”
Section: Copyright 1999 By the American Association For The Study Of mentioning
confidence: 99%