With whom shall I share my knowledge? A recipient perspective of knowledge sharing

Abstract

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 540409 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

Motivational theory and knowledge sharing in the public service

“…Venter, Erasmus and Seale (2015) reported that trust was amongst the attributes that promoted the knowledge sharing process in a CoP and was accelerated by the richness and depth of relationships formed during consecutive meetings. If a high level of mutual obligation, expectation and trust exists in a relationship, there will be less risk and uncertainty in future knowledge sharing exchanges (Zhang & Jiang 2015). A high level of trust which led to a high level of knowledge sharing observed in the PHRDF supported the assertion by Maponya (2005) that there must be a certain level of trust to develop and strengthen work relations and social interaction for knowledge sharing.…”

Model Perilaku Berbagi Pengetahuan antar IKM dalam Sebuah Sentra

“…Faktor yang menyebabkan rendahnya keberlanjutan usaha tersebut adalah: (1) usaha tidak memberikan keuntungan yang cukup, (2) permasalahan keuangan, (3) kesempatan usaha lain, (4) tidak adanya daya saing dan berbagai alasan lainnya (Nawangpalupi et al, 2014). Darcy et al (2014) menyatakan bahwa salah satu cara untuk menjaga keberlanjutan usaha adalah melalui pengelolaan kapabilitas sumber daya manusianya, dimana pengelolaan pengetahuan (knowledge management) yang baik menjadi faktor kunci (Darcy et al, 2014;Zhang dan Jiang, 2015). Melalui pengelolaan pengetahuan yang baik, dan aktivitas berbagi pengetahuan yang efektif, maka proses pembelajaran dalan organisasi dapat dipercepat dan dapat meningkatkan performansi organisasi tersebut (Tesavrita dan Suryadi, 2016).…”

The Interactive Role of Temporal Team Leadership in the Telecom Sector of Pakistan: Utilizing Temporal Diversity for Sustainable Knowledge Sharing

“…Knowledge sharing is affected by some conflicts, and when these conflicts arise, they function as a hindrance or obstacle for sustainable knowledge sharing. The concept of temporal conflict was discussed by Zhang [29]. Conflicts increase as the amount of diversity in a team increases, which further leads to various problems, like interpersonal conflicts and other disputes [13].…”

“…Teams with productive knowledge sharing often think, plan, and act proactively. Individuals' ability, attitude, and willingness to share knowledge matter a lot while discussing team dynamics [29]. One of the perspectives throws light on the term "functional fixity".…”

“…The scale was initially proposed by Gevers et al [28] and was later adapted by Zhang [29]. The scale describes the pattern of effort distribution over the time available to complete a team task, i.e., an individual's style of doing the task which includes early action and deadline action (e.g., "When performing a task or project, I start right away and finish the work long before the deadline" or "I do not get much done on a task or project until the due date is close", etc.).…”