With or without U(nions)? Understanding the diversity of gig workers’ organizing practices in Italy and the UK

Abstract

Since 2016, mobilizations of gig workers across European countries have become increasingly common within location-based services, such as food delivery. Despite remarkable similarities in workers’ mobilization dynamics, their organizational forms have varied considerably, ranging from self-organization, to work councils, to unionization through rank-and-file or longstanding unions. To start making sense of this diversity in organizing practices, we compare two cases of mobilization in the food delivery sector: in Italy, where workers have initially opted for self-organization, and in the UK, where they have organized through rank-and-file unions. Drawing on interview and observational data gathered between 2016 and 2018, we find that the diversity of organizational forms across the two cases derives from the interaction between agential and contextual factors, namely: the capabilities of rank-and-file unions and the political tradition of militant organizing of the environment within which gig workers are embedded. These findings contribute to the emerging debate on labour relations in the gig economy by showing the central role that factors external to the labour process and to the institutional context play in shaping the structuring of labour antagonism in a still lowly institutionalized sector characterized by transnationally homogenous challenges.

The organizational psychology of gig work: An integrative conceptual review.

“…In a similar way, Saundry et al (2007) found that the creative workers they studied used the information on forum members’ shared experiences of specific employers to bargain more effectively. Banding together to create resource repositories may also unite workers in ways that help them feel as though they are gaining power and security which can often be depleted through algorithmic management (Wood et al, 2018), and may even help with union organizing (Blagoev et al, 2019; Cini et al, in press; Maffie, 2020).…”

Collective regulation and the future of work in the digital economy: Insights from comparative employment relations

“…Meanwhile, comparative research findings show the importance of a combination of grassroots organizing (Joyce and Stuart, 2021) and new approaches to building solidarity – not only among gig workers themselves (Tassinari and Maccarrone, 2020; Cini et al 2021) but also among the organizations representing them. Vandaele (2021: 206) argues that the platform economy’s ‘distinctively disordered nature’ encourages creativity and experimentation in labour relations; particularly encouraging cooperation between established unions and newer, more informally organized worker representatives.…”

Eppur si Muove! Young People, Issue Salience and Volatility in Nine European Countries

“…We find not only that young people engage to a low extent through formal mechanisms of participation (Blais et al 2004;Dalton 2009) but also that party loyalties and attachments are less stable among the younger cohorts. It has been noted that young people were overrepresented among protesters against precarious work and racism (Cini et al 2022;Della Porta 2019). A recent study found that parties with strong ties to civil society organizations have a more stable voter base (Martin et al 2022).…”