2014
DOI: 10.3138/ecf.27.1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wit at War: The Poetry of John Wilmot and the Trauma of War

Abstract: On 3 August 1665, John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, barely eighteen years old, penned a long, dutiful, and what he ultimately char acterizes as a "tedious" letter to his mother. 1 He wrote from off the coast of Norway, while on board the ship Revenge during his first tour of duty in the Second Anglo-Dutch war. The letter begins in a measured, strangely untroubled voice. Rochester describes a crowded "Harbour where twenty shipps were to anchor not bigg enough for seven ... [the ships] all together one upon anothe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet his poetry is largely read as transcending the traumas of his age, including the English Civil War, and the brutal, mercenary Second Anglo‐Dutch War in which he served, rather than speaking to that trauma. My article, “Wit at War: The Poetry of John Wilmot and the Trauma of War” (2014) remains the only one to explore his war trauma and its relationship to his legendary wit. These isolated treatments point to our discipline's recognition of the value of trauma theory as a lens for reading complex, unusual 18th‐century texts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet his poetry is largely read as transcending the traumas of his age, including the English Civil War, and the brutal, mercenary Second Anglo‐Dutch War in which he served, rather than speaking to that trauma. My article, “Wit at War: The Poetry of John Wilmot and the Trauma of War” (2014) remains the only one to explore his war trauma and its relationship to his legendary wit. These isolated treatments point to our discipline's recognition of the value of trauma theory as a lens for reading complex, unusual 18th‐century texts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%