Humor and Laughter 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9780203789469-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wit and Humour in Mass Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of the literature on the use of humor in educational materials conducted between 1977 and 2001 concluded that humor does have some effect on learning, but that the effect is small, inconsistent, and indirect (Martin, Preiss, Gayle, & Allen, 2006). However, a wide variety of studies also report that humorous content has no effect on recall in adult populations (Cantor & Venus, 1980;Fisher, 1997;Gruner, 1976;Gruner & Freshley, 1979;LoSchivo, Frank, & Shatz, 2005;Taylor, 1964). In Ziv's (1988) review of the 18 research articles on humor done between 1961 and 1981, only three of the eleven studies performed with college students reported a positive effect on retention.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of the literature on the use of humor in educational materials conducted between 1977 and 2001 concluded that humor does have some effect on learning, but that the effect is small, inconsistent, and indirect (Martin, Preiss, Gayle, & Allen, 2006). However, a wide variety of studies also report that humorous content has no effect on recall in adult populations (Cantor & Venus, 1980;Fisher, 1997;Gruner, 1976;Gruner & Freshley, 1979;LoSchivo, Frank, & Shatz, 2005;Taylor, 1964). In Ziv's (1988) review of the 18 research articles on humor done between 1961 and 1981, only three of the eleven studies performed with college students reported a positive effect on retention.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why we tried to find studies regarding humour and memory that are close to our subject and perhaps support its scientific basis. Gruner (1976) pointed out that out of the nine studies he examined, eight showed that those who learned with humour did not remember more and only one study showed that memory was better when learning with humour. Another study showed that material learned with humorous characteristics was remembered better for a period of one month after learning, but after a year, all differences were erased (Davies & Apter 1980).…”
Section: Will Materials Learned In a Humorous Manner Be Remembered Betmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Foot and Mc-Creaddie (1986), the studies that show that humor does not aid memory outnumber the studies that show a positive or negative effect. However, Gruner (1976) found that humor is entertaining and renders the communicator more popular. Though humor has to be applied correctly and when misused may backfire on the communicator, the general conviction is that there is no reason for teachers or preachers to abandon its use.…”
Section: Humor and Sermonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humor makes use of the element of surprise, thus creating interest in a message (Heath & Heath, 2007) and creating positive feelings towards the communicator (Gruner, 1976). Wanzer, Frymier and Irwin (2010) found that humor is positively correlated to learning.…”
Section: Six Communicative Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%