2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wisp-like structures in vertical gas–liquid pipe flow revealed by wire mesh sensor studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to check the possibility to broaden the application of gas-liquid flow models to compute slug frequency for gas-liquid-liquid flow, the experimental data of slug frequency for different superficial oil and water velocities (ranged within the intervals of 0.36<Jo<0.60 m/s and 1.05<Jw<1.32 m/s) were compared with some of the most used correlations, listed in Table 5. A detailed description of these models was presented in the study of Hernandez-Perez et al (2010). Among the models reported in Table 5, the correlation developed by Gokcal (2010) is based on high viscosity data and does not consider the influence of superficial gas velocity.…”
Section: Slug Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to check the possibility to broaden the application of gas-liquid flow models to compute slug frequency for gas-liquid-liquid flow, the experimental data of slug frequency for different superficial oil and water velocities (ranged within the intervals of 0.36<Jo<0.60 m/s and 1.05<Jw<1.32 m/s) were compared with some of the most used correlations, listed in Table 5. A detailed description of these models was presented in the study of Hernandez-Perez et al (2010). Among the models reported in Table 5, the correlation developed by Gokcal (2010) is based on high viscosity data and does not consider the influence of superficial gas velocity.…”
Section: Slug Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of flow pattern classifications exists partly due to the subjective nature of identification methods and can also be attributed to the effects of flow conditions, pipe geometry, and fluid properties. Additionally, the application of current technologies such as wire mesh sensors is aiding more accurate identification of previously unknown flow characteristics (Abdulkadir et al, 2014a;Aliyu et al, 2017;Almabrok et al, 2016;Ambrose, 2015;Hernandez Perez et al, 2010;Peddu et al, 2018). Common flow patterns reported, however, are bubble, slug, churn (froth), annular (Hewakandamby et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among tomographic techniques based on a variety of measuring principles—such as gamma-ray, X-ray, impedance, ultrasound and others—a technique known as the wire-mesh sensor has emerged as a very competitive alternative, due to its high spatial and temporal resolution (up to few millimeters and few kilohertz range). It has been applied in a number of pilot plant studies around the world [2,3,4,5,6]. Hence, in this paper, the wire-mesh sensor was applied for the first time to characterize the flow inside reduced-scale subsea equipment from the oil industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%