1961
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1961.11010706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wisconsin Studies of the Measurement and Prediction of Teacher Effectiveness a Summary of Investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout its history, however, research on teacher effectiveness has found few consistent relationships between teacher variables and effectiveness measures, typically operationalized as student test scores (e.g., Barr, 1961;Morsh & Wilder, 1954;Rosenshine, 1970). Consequently, earlier scholars (e.g., Brophy, 1973) argued against "the indiscriminate use of student gain or general achievement tests for assessing teacher accountability" and stressed that " [u]ntil the sources of instability become known and are eliminated or controlled, this procedure is inappropriate, and certainly unfair to many teachers" (p. 251).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout its history, however, research on teacher effectiveness has found few consistent relationships between teacher variables and effectiveness measures, typically operationalized as student test scores (e.g., Barr, 1961;Morsh & Wilder, 1954;Rosenshine, 1970). Consequently, earlier scholars (e.g., Brophy, 1973) argued against "the indiscriminate use of student gain or general achievement tests for assessing teacher accountability" and stressed that " [u]ntil the sources of instability become known and are eliminated or controlled, this procedure is inappropriate, and certainly unfair to many teachers" (p. 251).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument represents what, to be charitable, can only be called severe myopia with regard to both the history of research on teacher quality and reasonable, open-minded investigation of test validation. With regard to research on teacher quality, two classic studies on teacher quality are noteworthy; namely, the Charters and Waples (1929) Commonwealth Teacher Training Study, and the work of A.S. Barr et al (1961). The Commonwealth Teacher Training Study was intended to identify "the traits that characterize excellent teachers" (p. 4) and the activities of successful teachers so as to provide a sound and empirical basis for "modem" teachertraining curricula.…”
Section: Measuring Teacher Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 138 studies, summarised by Barr (1948), only 19 used student gain as a criterion of teacher competence, and Mitzel and Gross (1956) reported only 20 studies which had a student growth criterion to measure teacher effectiveness.…”
Section: Teacher Effectiveness Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%