Wisconsin's forests, 2004

Perry, Charles H.; Everson, V.A.; Brown, Ian K.; Cummings-Carlson, Jane; Dahir, Sally E.; Jepsen, Edward A.; Kovach, Joseph K.; Labissoniere, Michael D.; Mace, Terry; Padley, Eunice A.; Rideout, Richard; Butler, Brett J.; Crocker, Susan J.; Liknes, Greg C.; Morin, Randall S.; Nelson, Mark D.; Wilson, Barry T.; Woodall, Christopher W.

doi:10.2737/nrs-rb-23

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At ~5 people per km², Menominee County is the least populated county in Wisconsin. More than 90% of it is forested, a figure matched in only two other Wisconsin counties (Perry et al 2008). The next three largest reservations, in order, have densities of 2.0, 5.9, and 10.3 people per km² (relative to an average of 40.6/km² statewide).…”

Section: Forestland Type Cover and Landscape Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 97%

First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA

Waller¹,

Reo²

2018

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indigenous peoples manage forestlands and wildlife differently than public and private forestland managers. To evaluate ecological outcomes from these differences, we compared the structure, composition, and diversity of Ojibwe and Menominee tribal forests to nearby nontribal forestlands in northern Wisconsin. These indigenous peoples seek to manage forests for mature conditions, accommodate wolves and other predators, and hunt deer to sustain traditional livelihood values. Their forests are often more mature with higher tree volume, higher rates of tree regeneration, more plant diversity, and fewer invasive species than nearby nontribal forestlands. In contrast, nontribal forestlands lost appreciable plant diversity in the 20th century and have failed to regenerate tree species sensitive to deer herbivory. Ensuing shifts in forest composition and wildlife populations have jeopardized the ability of managers to sustain wildlife and meet certification standards on nontribal forestlands. Lessons from tribal forestlands could help improve the sustainable management of nontribal public forestlands.

show abstract

Section: Forestland Type Cover and Landscape Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 97%

First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA

Waller¹,

Reo²

2018

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[29,33]. В работах многих авторов признается благо приятное влияние полезащитных лесополос на почвы и окружающую среду в результате умень шения интенсивности почвенной эрозии, а также за счет целого ряда других положительных эф фектов: а) улучшения микроклимата вследствие снегозадержания зимой, уменьшения испарения и создания условий для накопления доступной для растений почвенной влаги весной и летом; б) увеличения урожайности сельскохозяйствен ных культур; в) формирования среды обитания диких животных и дикорастущих растений; г) улучшения эстетического восприятия ланд шафта [1,9,23,24,26,28]. В свете проблемы глобального изменения кли мата изучение экосистем полезащитных лесопо лос приобретает новое звучание, так как в совре менных условиях они могут рассматриваться как объекты ассимиляции углерода из углекислого газа атмосферы за счет связывания его в фитомас се и почвенном органическом веществе.…”

Section: генезис и география почвunclassified

Накопление Органического Углерода В Черноземах (Моллисолях) Под Полезащитными Лесными Насаждениями В России И США

Чендев¹,

Соэр²,

Геннадиев³

et al. 2015

Почвоведение

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…References to the periodic inventories of 1936 (Cunningham and Moser 1938, Cunningham et al 1939), 1956(Stone and Thorne 1961), 1968(Spencer and Thorne 1972(Spencer et al 1988, and 1996 (Kotar et al 1999, Schmidt 1998 refer to that single year of Wisconsin inventory, but references to annual inventories of 2004 (Perry et al 2007), 2009 (Perry et al 2012), and 2014 refer to the periods ending in those years, i.e., 2000to 2004, 2005to 2009, and 2010, respectively. Comparisons are valid between 2004, 2009 inventories, which are based on FIA's annual inventory system.…”

Section: How Do We Compare Estimates From Different Inventories?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Wisconsin Forests 2014

Kurtz¹,

Dahir²,

Stoltman³

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report summarizes the third annual inventory of Wisconsin's forests, conducted 2009-2014. Wisconsin's forests cover 17.1 million acres with 16.6 million acres classified as timberland. Forests are bountiful in the north with Florence, Forest, Menominee, and Vilas Counties having over 90 percent forest cover. In the southeastern part of the State, forest cover is lowest with Dodge, Fond du Lac, Milwaukee, and Racine Counties having less than 10 percent forest cover. The sawtimber volume on timberland has been rising and is estimated to be 69.5 billion board feet. Oak/hickory is the predominant forest-type group, covering one-quarter of the forest land. The statewide growth-to-removal ratio on timberland is 2.2, indicating growth is outpacing removals. Additional information on Wisconsin's forests such as growth, mortality, species composition, ownership, diseases, invasive plant species, and forest economics is detailed in this report. Information on forest inventory methods, data quality estimates, and important resource statistics can be found online at https://doi

show abstract

Wisconsin's forests, 2004

Abstract: If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else. -Yogi Berra Above: Eastern hemlock by stream. Photo used with permission from Steven J. Baskauf, bioimages.vanderbilt.edu. Inset: Algoma. Photo used with permission from Wisconsin DNR.

Cited by 9 publications

References 9 publications

First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA

First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA

Накопление Органического Углерода В Черноземах (Моллисолях) Под Полезащитными Лесными Насаждениями В России И США

Wisconsin Forests 2014

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About