2004
DOI: 10.1504/ijmc.2004.004486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless trust: conceptual and operational definition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal consistency reliability of Venkatesh's et al's (2003) original questionnaire was 0.87. The instrument to measure the level of WT (5) of users of Wi-Fi was adapted from the conceptual and definition of WT by Lu et al (2004). The questions were revised to reflect the nature of Wi-Fi.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The internal consistency reliability of Venkatesh's et al's (2003) original questionnaire was 0.87. The instrument to measure the level of WT (5) of users of Wi-Fi was adapted from the conceptual and definition of WT by Lu et al (2004). The questions were revised to reflect the nature of Wi-Fi.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WT can be defined as the extent of a user's belief that privacy protection, security assurance, and system reliability are achieved within a wireless technology (Lu, Yu, Liu & Yao, 2004). Lu et al, (2003a) argued that trust is a complex social phenomenon that reflects technological, behavioral, social, and psychological, as well as organizational aspects, of interactions among various human and non-human agents.…”
Section: Wireless Trust (Wt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations