2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/216/1/012050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless Smart Sensor Network System Using SmartBridge Sensor Nodes for Structural Health Monitoring of Existing Concrete Bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the scalar damage of the top transducers showed early signs of damage propagation as compared to the middle, and bottom transducers since the inclination angles of the elastic data trend in Figures 7 and 8 are 18.468° and 18.989°, respectively, which is higher compared to the middle transducers with 3.579° and 9.373°, respectively, in contrast to the bottom transducers with 2.053° and 0.968°, respectively. These gradual deviations of scalar damage represented by the inclination angle indicate microstructural degradation detected using ultrasonic pulses and further magnified by the scalar damage formula to monitor the concrete's degradation prior to the formation of macrocrack defects and aligned with the studies of Nogueira and Rens [4] and Gaviña et al [5]. On the contrary, the middle transducers of Figure 9 showed early signs of deterioration with an inclination angle of 3.621° compared to the top transducers with 3.014°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the scalar damage of the top transducers showed early signs of damage propagation as compared to the middle, and bottom transducers since the inclination angles of the elastic data trend in Figures 7 and 8 are 18.468° and 18.989°, respectively, which is higher compared to the middle transducers with 3.579° and 9.373°, respectively, in contrast to the bottom transducers with 2.053° and 0.968°, respectively. These gradual deviations of scalar damage represented by the inclination angle indicate microstructural degradation detected using ultrasonic pulses and further magnified by the scalar damage formula to monitor the concrete's degradation prior to the formation of macrocrack defects and aligned with the studies of Nogueira and Rens [4] and Gaviña et al [5]. On the contrary, the middle transducers of Figure 9 showed early signs of deterioration with an inclination angle of 3.621° compared to the top transducers with 3.014°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Unfortunately, visual inspection is the most common practice in some developing countries to monitor the concrete's structural integrity. The problem is that it is fully experiencedbased, applicable only when the damage is visible and subjective, or non-quantitative [5]. Accurate structural integrity monitoring is critical since natural disasters such as Super Typhoons and Earthquakes are always a significant threat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In Moreu et al, 22 the response of a bridge structure when a train passes over was measured by a wireless sensor network platform developed by Intel called Imote2. In Gavin˜a et al, 23 an acceleration wireless sensor network was used to monitor the structural response of a concrete bridge, and the health status of the bridge was evaluated. In He et al, 24 bridge structural modals were tested using a wireless sensor network, whose results were compared with those of a wired sensor network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%