2017
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2017.2654341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless Multihop Device-to-Device Caching Networks

Abstract: We consider a wireless device-to-device (D2D) network where n nodes are uniformly distributed at random over the network area. We let each node with storage capacity M cache files from a library of size m ≥ M . Each node in the network requests a file from the library independently at random, according to a popularity distribution, and is served by other nodes having the requested file in their local cache via (possibly) multihop transmissions. Under the classical "protocol model" of wireless networks, we char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, F-RANs with D2D communication have not yet been considered, apart from the conference versions of this work [25], [26]. Content delivery in a multi-hop D2D caching network was instead studied in [27], where the per-node capacity scaling law was derived. In [28], it was shown that in-band transmitter or receiver cooperation cannot increase the sum DoF of an interference channel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, F-RANs with D2D communication have not yet been considered, apart from the conference versions of this work [25], [26]. Content delivery in a multi-hop D2D caching network was instead studied in [27], where the per-node capacity scaling law was derived. In [28], it was shown that in-band transmitter or receiver cooperation cannot increase the sum DoF of an interference channel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, for M < K and r F ≥ 1, the achievable NDT (23) satisfies 27 where (a) follows from δ ach (µ, r F , r D ) being a monotonically decreasing function of µ and since µ > 0, whereas (b) is due to r F ≥ 1. Dividing (72) by (60) gives…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 10b shows the cache hit ratio of the three schemes as well as the number of replacements of LRU and the (simplified) proposed dynamic caching versus the cache size N c in the range of [10,100]. The popularity skewness parameter s is 0.8, and the average content lifetime for the 100 most popular files is 32.7 minutes.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cache-aided interference channel where both ENs and users have caching capabilities was studied in [9], and lower and upper bound on the sum degrees-of-freedom were presented under the constraint of linear precoders at the ENs. Content delivery in a D2D caching network, i.e., without ENs, was studied in [10], where the per-node capacity scaling law was characterized for multi-hop D2D communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%