2018
DOI: 10.1515/eng-2018-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless Light-Weight IEC 61850 Based Loss of Mains Protection for Smart Grid

Abstract: This paper presents a novel Loss of Mains (LoM) protection method based on IEC 61850 Manufacturing Messages Specification (MMS) protocol over wireless Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) based access point name (APN) mechanism. LoM or anti islanding protection is a key requirement in modern power distribution grids where there is significant amount of distributed energy resources (DER). The future Smart Grids are based on extensive communication capabilities and thus the communication based LoM approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected one-way transfer time of 20 ms for producing results corresponded to the fast messages of type 1B (the ideal case) with performance class P2/P3 (transfer time class TT4) [33,35], and it covers the worst-case delay of 18 ms of type 1A fast messages according to the IEC 60834 mentioned above. The considered transfer time was also within the range of practical observed time delays in the light-weight implementation of the IEC 61850 standard-based GOOSE messages done in [40]. Although GOOSE messages apply the heartbeat messages and an IED will issue a so-called burst of GOOSE messages right after the detection of the fault, for the final trip decision, the IED necessarily needs to know the updated status at the downstream IED after the fault to ensure proper coordination.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The selected one-way transfer time of 20 ms for producing results corresponded to the fast messages of type 1B (the ideal case) with performance class P2/P3 (transfer time class TT4) [33,35], and it covers the worst-case delay of 18 ms of type 1A fast messages according to the IEC 60834 mentioned above. The considered transfer time was also within the range of practical observed time delays in the light-weight implementation of the IEC 61850 standard-based GOOSE messages done in [40]. Although GOOSE messages apply the heartbeat messages and an IED will issue a so-called burst of GOOSE messages right after the detection of the fault, for the final trip decision, the IED necessarily needs to know the updated status at the downstream IED after the fault to ensure proper coordination.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In [3,48] ABB RED670 IEDs are used as hardware to study GOOSE and SV communication over presumably wired connection. In [49,50], WiFi communication network is used to study line differential and overcurrent protection based on field measurements, while hardware prototype for loss-of-mains protection over Global System for Mobile (GSM) is studied in [51]. In [52] applicability of 5G for state estimation is studied with co-simulation and in [53] fault inspection over 5G and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is simulated.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], a Wi-Fi communication network is used to study line differential and overcurrent protection based on field measurements. In contrast, a hardware prototype for loss-of-mains protection over Global System for Mobile (GSM) is studied in [20]. In [44], the applicability of 5G for state estimation is studied with co-simulation, and in [45], fault inspection over 5G and unpiloted aerial vehicle (UAV) is simulated.…”
Section: Commercial Communication Network 5gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [17,18] use hardware IEDs for GOOSE and sampled values (SV) communication but do not mention which communication technology is deployed, while [19][20][21] have implemented 5G networks but with software-based IEDs. Furthermore, in [19], the 5G network is a simulation and not a realistic commercial network; in [20], the network is a prototype of a 5G core implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%