2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2943885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireframe Parsing With Guidance of Distance Map

Abstract: We propose an end-to-end method for simultaneously detecting local junctions and global wireframe in man-made environment. Our pipeline consists of an anchor-free junction detection module, a distance map learning module, and a line segment proposing and verification module. A set of line segments are proposed from the predicted junctions with guidance of the learned distance map, and further verified by the proposal verification module. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the previous state-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our fastest model, M-LSD-tiny with 320 input size, has a slightly lower performance than that of TP-LSD-Lite, but achieves an increase of 130.5% in inference speed with only 2.5% of the model size. Compared to the previous lightest model TP-LSD-HG, M-LSD with 512 input size outperforms on sAP 5 , sAP 10 and LAP with an increase of 136.0% in inference speed with 20.3% of the model size. Our lightest model, M-LSD-tiny with 320 input size, shows an increase of 310.6% in the inference speed with 8.1% of the model size compared to TP-LSD-HG.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our fastest model, M-LSD-tiny with 320 input size, has a slightly lower performance than that of TP-LSD-Lite, but achieves an increase of 130.5% in inference speed with only 2.5% of the model size. Compared to the previous lightest model TP-LSD-HG, M-LSD with 512 input size outperforms on sAP 5 , sAP 10 and LAP with an increase of 136.0% in inference speed with 20.3% of the model size. Our lightest model, M-LSD-tiny with 320 input size, shows an increase of 310.6% in the inference speed with 8.1% of the model size compared to TP-LSD-HG.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The top-down strategy [30] first detects regions of line segment with attraction field maps and then predicts line segments by squeezing regions into line segments. In contrast, the bottomup strategy first detects junctions, then arranges them into line segments, and lastly verifies the line segments by using an extra classifier [36,31,35] or a merging algorithm [10,11]. Recently, [12] proposes Tri-Points (TP) representation for a simpler process of line prediction without the time-consuming steps of line proposal and verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the user perspective, the ultimate goal would be to reverseengineer a CAD model (Gonzalez-Aguilera et al, 2012;Li et al, 2017b;Durupt et al, 2008). Several works have investigated wireframe parsing in 2D images (Huang et al, 2018;Huang & Gao, 2019). LCNN (Zhou et al, 2019a) is an end-to-end trainable system that directly outputs a vectorised wireframe.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top-down strategy (Xue et al 2019a) first detects regions of line segment with attraction field maps and then squeezes these regions into line segments to make predictions. In contrast, the bottom-up strategy first detects junctions, then arranges them into line segments, and lastly verifies the line segments by using an extra classifier (Zhou, Qi, and Ma 2019;Xue et al 2020;Zhang et al 2019) or a merging algorithm (Huang and Gao 2019;Huang et al 2018). Recently, (Huang et al 2020) proposes Tri-Points (TP) representation for a simpler process of line prediction without the time-consuming steps of line proposal and verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%