Wir müssen abwägen – aber wie sollen wir abwägen?

Abstract

The global Covid-19 crisis raises at least three moral questions, which my contribution answers as follows: (1) Which patient should get treatment according to triage criteria? The patient whose treatment has the best prospect of success. (2) How should we resolve the conflict between public health measures and economic needs? Public health should have priority, but reaches its limits where the individual right to stay afloat through one’s own work is violated. (3) How should we resolve the conflict between public health measures and civil liberties? Public health should have priority, but reaches its limits where the restriction of freedom violates the integrity of individual health and personal freedom. The answers and the arguments behind these are developed through the discussion of a wide range of current public health policies, concrete measures, and competing approaches to moral questions in the Covid-19 pandemic.

Increased morality through social communication or decision situation worsens the acceptance of robo-advisors

“…Criteria such as nationality, age, or gender should not be included in the decision-making process (Zoglauer, 2022). Better chances of recovery are the only legitimate reason for giving preference to patients (Wingert, 2021). Despite these German recommendations, in the very moral decision situation, a strong preference for young life could be observed (Awad et al, 2018) in our German sample.…”