1991
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
70
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The fourth, Two Postverbal Words CA used only the two post-verbal words because adjacent word statistics are commonly used in computational models (e.g., trigrams, Chang et al, 2008;Redington et al, 1998;Mintz et al, 2002). Because our corpus analysis identified transitives as a possible source of locative verb class information, our final CA (Transitive CA) explored whether there was sufficient information in post-verbal articles and nouns (that is, in transitive but not locative utterances) to correctly classify locative verbs (Levin & Rappaport Hovav, 1991). This analysis therefore used the same input as the Two Post-verbal Words CA, but excluded prepositions as well as any words following these prepositions.…”
Section: A Corpus-based Test Of the Distributional Learning Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth, Two Postverbal Words CA used only the two post-verbal words because adjacent word statistics are commonly used in computational models (e.g., trigrams, Chang et al, 2008;Redington et al, 1998;Mintz et al, 2002). Because our corpus analysis identified transitives as a possible source of locative verb class information, our final CA (Transitive CA) explored whether there was sufficient information in post-verbal articles and nouns (that is, in transitive but not locative utterances) to correctly classify locative verbs (Levin & Rappaport Hovav, 1991). This analysis therefore used the same input as the Two Post-verbal Words CA, but excluded prepositions as well as any words following these prepositions.…”
Section: A Corpus-based Test Of the Distributional Learning Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally (Talmy 1975(Talmy , 1985Jackendoff 1983, Levin andRappaport Hovav 1991), there have been two main ways of dividing verbs: i. manner versus path, as in jog versus cross; and ii. manner versus result, as in wipe versus clean.…”
Section: Manner and Results Verbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Según Levin y Rappaport (2005: 233), "when verbs with manner roots are found in a complex event structure, the type of result must be one that can be naturally obtained given the type of manner". 49 Siguiendo a Levin y Rappaport (véase, por ejemplo, Levin y Rappaport, 1991;Levin y Rappaport, 2013), barrer y fregar serían verbos de actividad que describen un proceso que puede llevarse a cabo indefinidamente y que no codifican alcanzar ningún resultado. 50 Cito a continuación las definiciones que da el DUE (Moliner, M., Diccionario de uso del español, Madrid, Gredos, 1971) de barrer y de fregar: Barrer: Arrastrar con una escoba o utensilio que haga el mismo efecto basura, desperdicios, etc., para limpiar de ellos el suelo.…”
Section: La Clase Léxico Aspectual Y Los Complementos Relacionados Counclassified