Wiping reflex in the intact and spinal frogs

Berkinblit, M. B.; Sidorova, V. Yu.; Tkach, T. V.

doi:10.1007/bf01053337

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, bilateral extension of the hindlimbs during swimming in frogs is driven by spinal circuits (Rauscent et al, 2007;Sillar et al, 2008) and modulated by sensory feedback (Stehouwer and Farel, 1981). Likewise, the wiping reflex persists in spinalized anurans (Berkinblit et al, 1995). Third, results from studies exploring toad landing preparation in the absence of different forms of sensory feedback are consistent with hindlimb extension triggering landing preparation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

The integration of sensory feedback in the modulation of anuran landing preparation

Cox

Gillis

2020

Journal of Experimental Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Controlled landing requires preparation. Mammals and bipedal birds vary how they prepare for landing by predicting the timing and magnitude of impact from the integration of visual and non-visual information. Here we explore how an animal that moves primarily through hopping, Rhinella marina, the cane toad, integrates sensory information to modulate landing preparation. Earlier work suggests toads may modulate landing preparation using predictions of impact timing and/or magnitude based on non-visual sensory feedback during takeoff rather than visual cues about the landing itself. Here we disentangled takeoff and landing conditions by hopping toads off platforms of different heights and measured electromyographic (EMG) activity of an elbow extensor, m. anconeus, and used high-speed motion capture to quantify whole body and forelimb kinematics to test how toads integrate visual and non-visual information in landing preparation. We asked two questions: 1) when they conflict, do toads correlate landing preparation with takeoff or landing conditions? And 2) for hops with the same takeoff conditions, does visual information alter the timing of landing preparation? We found that takeoff conditions are a better predictor of the onset of landing preparation than landing conditions, but that visual information is not ignored. When hopping off higher platforms, toads start to prepare for landing later when takeoff conditions are invariant. This suggests that, unlike mammals, toads prioritize non-visual sensory feedback about takeoff conditions to coordinate landing, but that they do integrate visual information to fine-tune landing preparation.

show abstract