2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.0105-4538.2001.documendoc.doc.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wipe test for the detection of indoor allergens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other alternatives to household allergen collection using a vacuum cleaner have been assessed (Polzius et al, 2002;Sercombe et al, 2005). A quasireal-time commercial instrument with visual display of allergen level has been developed (Drager Bio-Check Allergen Control; Polzius et al, 2002) and compared to vacuum-cleaner based sampling with mixed results (Polzius et al, 2002;Sercombe et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several other alternatives to household allergen collection using a vacuum cleaner have been assessed (Polzius et al, 2002;Sercombe et al, 2005). A quasireal-time commercial instrument with visual display of allergen level has been developed (Drager Bio-Check Allergen Control; Polzius et al, 2002) and compared to vacuum-cleaner based sampling with mixed results (Polzius et al, 2002;Sercombe et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quasireal-time commercial instrument with visual display of allergen level has been developed (Drager Bio-Check Allergen Control; Polzius et al, 2002) and compared to vacuum-cleaner based sampling with mixed results (Polzius et al, 2002;Sercombe et al, 2005). One shortcoming is that a separate device is necessary for each allergen of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mite group 1 [125] and mite group 2 [126] allergen measurements have been considered as a gold standard for monitoring mite allergen extracts as well as dust mite allergen levels. Twosite ELISA have been developed using lateral flow technology, and can be used as rapid tests by patients themselves or by investigators, to make decisions about exposure and about allergen avoidance something like lateral flow test [127,128] …”
Section: (5) Two-site Elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, immunoassays such as enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or lateral flow immunochromatographic assay are used for one-time measurement. (10)(11)(12)(13)(14) Other state-of-the-art methods for measuring the allergens have also been reported. (17) Despite such remarkable progress in the development of allergen biosensors, the difficulties of repeatedly using the same sensor surface by regenerating it after each measurement have been drawbacks in the development of an immunosensor for monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%