1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00027365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WIP1, a wound-inducible gene from maize with homology to Bowman-Birk proteinase inhibitors

Abstract: We have cloned and sequenced a wound-inducible cDNA clone designated WIP1 (for wound-induced protein) from maize coleoptiles. It was isolated by differential screening of a cDNA library prepared from excised maize coleoptile segments. The deduced amino acid sequence predicts a secretory, cysteine-rich protein of 102 residues with a calculated molecular mass of 11 kDa and a typical N-terminal signal sequence. The protein has about 30% identity with various Bowman-Birk type proteinase inhibitors. Most interestin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
48
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the microarray results and to compare 10-OPEA activity to other meaningful metabolites, we treated plants with either SA, 12-OPDA, JA, 10-OPEA, DA 0 -4:0, or SLB and compared the expression levels of pathogen-and insect-related genes at 3 h using qRT-PCR. Defense marker genes included ZmOPR2, the maize OPR most strongly up-regulated in response to SLB (40); pathogenesis-related 4b (ZmPR4b) and EF-hand Ca 2+ -binding protein (ZmCCD1), genes involved in the promotion of cell death and pathogen-elicited defense responses (41-43); GST 2 (ZmGST2) and hydrolase (ZmHYD), previously shown to be induced by both insect-and pathogen-related treatments (35,44); a stress-inducible oxidoreductase (ZmOXR); and maize cystatin 9 (ZmCC9), wound inducible protein 1 (ZmWIP1), and serine protease inhibitor (ZmSerPIN), that encode PIs inducible by biotic attack (27,45,46). The defense genes ZmPR4b, ZmOPR2, and ZmCCD1 were strongly induced by 10-OPEA and DA 0 -4:0 treatments with expression levels either statistically equivalent to or higher than those of 12-OPDA, JA, and SA ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the microarray results and to compare 10-OPEA activity to other meaningful metabolites, we treated plants with either SA, 12-OPDA, JA, 10-OPEA, DA 0 -4:0, or SLB and compared the expression levels of pathogen-and insect-related genes at 3 h using qRT-PCR. Defense marker genes included ZmOPR2, the maize OPR most strongly up-regulated in response to SLB (40); pathogenesis-related 4b (ZmPR4b) and EF-hand Ca 2+ -binding protein (ZmCCD1), genes involved in the promotion of cell death and pathogen-elicited defense responses (41-43); GST 2 (ZmGST2) and hydrolase (ZmHYD), previously shown to be induced by both insect-and pathogen-related treatments (35,44); a stress-inducible oxidoreductase (ZmOXR); and maize cystatin 9 (ZmCC9), wound inducible protein 1 (ZmWIP1), and serine protease inhibitor (ZmSerPIN), that encode PIs inducible by biotic attack (27,45,46). The defense genes ZmPR4b, ZmOPR2, and ZmCCD1 were strongly induced by 10-OPEA and DA 0 -4:0 treatments with expression levels either statistically equivalent to or higher than those of 12-OPDA, JA, and SA ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In maize, the induction of four genes, PR1, PR5, PRms, and Wip1, has been associated with the HR defense response (Casacuberta et al 1992;Rohrmeier and Lehle 1993;Morris et al 1998;Simmons et al 2002). We examined their expression in relation to developing Rp1-D21 lesions by RT-PCR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Figures 2 and 3 show that the Rp1-D21 phenotype is associated with the production of superoxide and H 2 O 2 , together with the induction of the genes PR1, PR5, PRms, and WIP1, all hallmarks of a bona fide HR. It should be noted that these genes can also be induced by a defense response not including HR and by various other stresses including wounding (Casacuberta et al 1991(Casacuberta et al , 1992Rohrmeier and Lehle 1993;Morris et al 1998;Dunkle and Levy 2000). Even so, the preponderance of evidence suggests that Rp1-D21 triggers an exaggerated form of the normal maize hypersensitive response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two active sites may have different biological significance; for example, the trypsin inhibitory site may be more important in protective functions against pest attack [19], whereas the chymotrypsin site may be of greater importance in the prevention of animal tumour development [21]. However, a wound-induced sequence, deduced to be active only against chymotrypsin, has been reported [18], although an inhibitor function has not been shown for this protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%