2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jc007845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter‐to‐winter recurrence and non‐winter‐to‐winter recurrence of SST anomalies in the central North Pacific

Abstract: [1] All previous studies of the winter-to-winter recurrence (WWR) of sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTA) have focused on mean climatic characteristics. Here, interannual variability of the SSTA WWR in the central North Pacific (CNP) is studied. The SSTA WWR displays a strong interannual variability in the CNP. The relative roles of atmospheric forcing and the oceanic reemergence mechanism are investigated by comparing SSTA WWR years and non-WWR years. Oceanic reemergence mechanism operates every year, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If anomalous atmospheric forcing was to occur repeatedly for several consecutive winters, but not in summer, this would tend to create recurring SSTA in winter. Different from lag autocorrelation analyses in the previous studies, Zhao and Li [2012]investigated interannual variability of the WWR in the central North Pacific. And they indicated that atmospheric circulation anomalies exhibit the WWR phenomenon during WWR years, but do not recur in the following winter during non‐WWR years.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If anomalous atmospheric forcing was to occur repeatedly for several consecutive winters, but not in summer, this would tend to create recurring SSTA in winter. Different from lag autocorrelation analyses in the previous studies, Zhao and Li [2012]investigated interannual variability of the WWR in the central North Pacific. And they indicated that atmospheric circulation anomalies exhibit the WWR phenomenon during WWR years, but do not recur in the following winter during non‐WWR years.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, the results of Zhao and Li [2012]showed that, although the winter‐to‐winter lag autocorrelations of geopotential height anomalies show a tendency to recur from one winter to the next without persisting through the intervening summer, it does not mean that the recurrent atmospheric circulation anomalies in the second winter come from those in the previous winter. Unlike the reemergence mechanism of the SSTA WWR, winter atmospheric anomalies do not persist at a certain layer of atmosphere through the intervening summer, suggesting that the recurrent atmospheric circulation anomalies in the second winter do not come from those in the previous winter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that the midlatitude SST anomaly forced by the Arctic ozone is initially stored beneath the surface and is then reentrained into the mixed layer when it deepens again in the following winter (i.e. winter-to-winter recurrence [12][13][14]), though whether this effect can account for the apparent 20-month lag needs to be investigated. Second, El Niño events are often followed by La Niña events (and vice versa), such that the autocorrelation of the NDJF seasonal mean Niño 3.4 index at a lag of two years is −0.32 over the period 1979/1980 through 2015/2016 in the ERSST v4 dataset [15].…”
Section: How Does Arctic Stratospheric Ozone Affect Enso?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the winter net surface heat flux variations; if these are large then winter SST variability will be dominated by these, with less re-emergence effects (Zhao and Li, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%