1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(87)90086-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter growth of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L.: importance of stock and site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Like studies performed on shallow water mussels (Dickie et al 1984;Mallet et al 1987), this demonstrated that shortterm adjustments to current environmental conditions account for a majority of the physiological variability observed among mussels inhabiting these seep sites.…”
Section: Size Class (Mm)supporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like studies performed on shallow water mussels (Dickie et al 1984;Mallet et al 1987), this demonstrated that shortterm adjustments to current environmental conditions account for a majority of the physiological variability observed among mussels inhabiting these seep sites.…”
Section: Size Class (Mm)supporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, different bivalve populations often respond differently to a given set of environmental conditions, reflecting the effects of genetic dif-ferentiation on organism response. Cold hardiness, growth, mortality, and biomass of bivalves have all been shown to be under some level of genetic control (Dickie et al 1984;Mallet et al 1986Mallet et al , 1987.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mallet et al (1987) stated that stock differences were important in explaining the variation in shell growth, but site alone accounted for most of the variation in tissue growth. Several authors claimed that stock does not appreciably affect growth rate, while it does affect mortality (Wallace, 1980;Dickie et al, 1984;Page and Hubbard, 1987;Mallet and Carver, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that mussel growth rate follows a seasonal pattern with the highest values during springsummer (e.g., Pieters et al, 1980;Mallet et al, 1987;Babarro et al, 2000), which is the upwelling season, a simple calculation will allow us to estimate the fraction of primary production that is channelled to mussels. From the total mussel production of 172 x 10 6 kg y-l in the Ria de Arousa (Table 1) and carbon content of mussel wet weight ("-'2.5%, Tenore et al, 1982;Perez-Camacho & Gonzalez, 1984) it follows that total carbon yield of mussels harvested in the Ria de Arousa is "-'4.3 x 10 6 kg C y-l.…”
Section: Primary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%