1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0022050700036512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winning the Eight-Hour Day, 1909–1919

Abstract: The American workers' quest for an eight-hour day finally came to an end around 1919. I argue that the most important factors behind the rapid decline in manufacturing hours in the decade before 1919 include the rapid expansion of the economy, which increased wages and drew new participants into the manufacturing sector; the reduction of immigration during the war; the growth in organized labor's strength; federal and state legislation that mandated reduced work weeks; and the electrification of the manufactur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand working hours had been falling since the 1890s, a trend that accelerated between 1909 and 1919 when the working week in manufacturing fell by a little over ten percent. The fall in hours occurred more gradually in the US than in Britain (though perhaps less smoothly than Whaples, 1990, suggests 7 ) and it owed something both to increased militancy and to changes in State hours laws, as well as to organizational shifts within firms in response to technological opportunities. But more importantly it took place against the background of sustained growth in labour productivity and slower growth in labour supply, as immigration dried up during the War.…”
Section: Labour Markets and Institutions In The 1920smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand working hours had been falling since the 1890s, a trend that accelerated between 1909 and 1919 when the working week in manufacturing fell by a little over ten percent. The fall in hours occurred more gradually in the US than in Britain (though perhaps less smoothly than Whaples, 1990, suggests 7 ) and it owed something both to increased militancy and to changes in State hours laws, as well as to organizational shifts within firms in response to technological opportunities. But more importantly it took place against the background of sustained growth in labour productivity and slower growth in labour supply, as immigration dried up during the War.…”
Section: Labour Markets and Institutions In The 1920smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adoption of the group or unit drive diminished time lost by making it possible to shut down only a single or a small number of machinery rather than the entire factory when a mechanical problem or need for speed change occurred. New technology and scientific management procedure, often believed to be closely related to electrification of production (Whaples 1990b), may have intensified the work as well. To take into account these potential impacts of utilizing electric power, the total horse power driven by electricity per production worker ( Electricity ) was included in the analysis.…”
Section: Industrial Characteristics Related To the Employment Of Oldementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35. See Marshall in Dankert et al (1965); Owen (1969); and Whaples (1990). See Richardson (1896, p. 602).…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%