1992
DOI: 10.1016/0018-506x(92)90016-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winning, losing, mood, and testosterone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
78
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If testosterone changes are indeed responsible for the power motive-implicit learning relationship, then the power motive-implicit learning correlation should no longer be significant after controlling for testosterone changes (cf. Baron and Kenny, 1986;McCaul et al, 1992). This was confirmed by our analyses: the power motive did not have a significant effect on implicit learning after partialling for testosterone changes, P Ͼ 0.05.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If testosterone changes are indeed responsible for the power motive-implicit learning relationship, then the power motive-implicit learning correlation should no longer be significant after controlling for testosterone changes (cf. Baron and Kenny, 1986;McCaul et al, 1992). This was confirmed by our analyses: the power motive did not have a significant effect on implicit learning after partialling for testosterone changes, P Ͼ 0.05.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…While some researchers report higher postcontest testosterone levels in winners than in losers (e.g., Gladue, Boechler, and McCaul, 1989;Mazur and Lamb, 1980;McCaul, Gladue, and Joppa, 1992), others have failed to obtain such a difference (e.g., GonzalezBono, Salvador, Serrano, and Ricarte, 1999;Mazur, Susman, and Edelbrock, 1997;Schultheiss, Campbell, and McClelland, 1999;Suay et al, 1999), thus raising doubts about the efficacy of situational outcomes to affect testosterone levels directly and reliably. Schultheiss et al (1999) have therefore recently argued that motivational dispositions may moderate the impact of situational outcomes such as winning or losing a competition on testosterone changes (for related arguments, see Berman, Gladue, and Taylor, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In human beings, testosterone has been reported to increase during aggression and anger (Christiansen & Knussmann 1987, Dabbs 1993, Scerbo & Kolko 1994, Van Honk et al 1999, dominance (Christiansen & Knussmann 1987), experiences of winning, for instance in sporting events (McCaul et al 1992, Bernhardt et al 1998, psychic stress (Christiansen et al 1985), and violent and antisocial behavior (Dabbs 1993) as well as with sexual activity (Dabbs 1993). It has been reported to decrease during experiences of losing (Dabbs 1993, Bernhardt et al 1998, anxiety (Davies et al 1992), passive avoidant coping behavior (Müller 1994), and depression (Dabbs 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCaul [5] reported that among individuals who participated in a task entirely controlled by chance (coin tossing), the winners were characterized by relatively higher testosterone levels and more positive moods. In another experiment [6] subjects were awarded $100 prizes that depended on a random lottery.…”
Section: Competition and Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%