2017
DOI: 10.5089/9781484330104.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winning Connections? Special Interests and the Sale of Failed Banks

Abstract: IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus on rent‐seeking in the financial sector, which, due to its size (see, e.g., Philippon, 2012, 2015) and complexity of transactions involved, is believed to relate to particularly intense lobbying and rent‐seeking activities (see, e.g., Igan & Lambert, 2019; Igan et al., 2012, 2017; Mazzucato, 2018; Stiglitz, 2012). 6 Evidence from, for example, Igan and Lambert (2019) and Igan et al.…”
Section: Empirical Motivation and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We focus on rent‐seeking in the financial sector, which, due to its size (see, e.g., Philippon, 2012, 2015) and complexity of transactions involved, is believed to relate to particularly intense lobbying and rent‐seeking activities (see, e.g., Igan & Lambert, 2019; Igan et al., 2012, 2017; Mazzucato, 2018; Stiglitz, 2012). 6 Evidence from, for example, Igan and Lambert (2019) and Igan et al.…”
Section: Empirical Motivation and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Evidence from, for example, Igan and Lambert (2019) and Igan et al. (2012, 2017) links lobbying activities to such rent‐seeking, which can take many forms. For example, it may capture beneficial access to better credit conditions and directed loans or subsidies to specific industries or households; preferential access to investment in new or protected markets (including preferential treatment in failed‐bank auctions), or in real estate, that imply higher returns; laxer treatment in the supervision of financial intermediaries, or less costly enforcement actions (e.g., lower penalties); and guaranteed bailouts (thus reducing the downside risk and allowing higher risk, higher return investment).…”
Section: Empirical Motivation and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations