2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winners and losers of school choice: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Santiago, Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Maps in Figure 5 show that inequality follow a clear pattern of segregation represented by an isolated cluster of higher developed municipalities located at the northeastern part of the city. Spatial segregation may act as a mechanism that reinforces income inequalities by spatially clustering the lower income population in areas with lower access to human development assets, such as education [69], health [70] and housing [71]. This suggests that the neoliberal model prevailing in Chile is limiting the access to development assets (e.g., private health, and higher education) for lower income sectors [66,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps in Figure 5 show that inequality follow a clear pattern of segregation represented by an isolated cluster of higher developed municipalities located at the northeastern part of the city. Spatial segregation may act as a mechanism that reinforces income inequalities by spatially clustering the lower income population in areas with lower access to human development assets, such as education [69], health [70] and housing [71]. This suggests that the neoliberal model prevailing in Chile is limiting the access to development assets (e.g., private health, and higher education) for lower income sectors [66,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chile, students who enrolled in private secondary schools had higher probabilities of completing secondary school than students enrolled at public schools following the implementation of a national voucher program, and these benefits were net of additional advantages derived from higher socioeconomic status (Torche 2005). A separate study of the voucher program in Chile and a similar program in Brazil found that disadvantaged families were less likely to use vouchers to choose a higher achieving school, contributing to the processes of widening inequality (Alves et al 2015). The advantages of private school enrollment were based, in part, on selection effects as private schools attracted higher status students and were able to use their own admission standards to admit higher performing students in contrast to public schools which were required to accept all students.…”
Section: Inequality Of Educational Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como resultado de las reformas, hubo un crecimiento impresionante de los colegios subvencionados. En 2010, el 52% de los colegios eran subvencionados, 8% eran particulares y 40%, municipales (Alves et al, 2015). La creación del sector subvencionado, más la ampliación de la educación municipal o 126 | mayo 2016 | pp.…”
Section: Padres Colegios Y Desigualdadunclassified