2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wing/canard interference of a close-coupled canard configuration in static ground effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these numerical computations have been approved by the wind and water tunnels tests. 9-12 According to the results, the vortex breakdown over the wing in presence of canard occurs farther from the wing trailing edge than that for an isolated wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Many of these numerical computations have been approved by the wind and water tunnels tests. 9-12 According to the results, the vortex breakdown over the wing in presence of canard occurs farther from the wing trailing edge than that for an isolated wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It was discovered that increasing the angle of attack in the ground effect amplified the blockage effect while reducing the nose-up pitching moment. The Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model were used to investigate the aerodynamics and flow physics of a close-coupled canard configuration with a sharp leading edge in static ground effect (Qin et al, 2017), as well as a 65 °sweep delta wing with a sharp leading edge in both static and dynamic ground effect (Qin et al, 2015;Qin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Frontiers In Mechanical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dakhrabadi 17 , et al studied ground effect characteristics as well as stability of compound wing. Qin 18 , et al analysed the ground effect of canard configuration numerically. They reported that non-linear increment in lift, drag as well as nose-down pitching moment coefficients with reduction in ground clearance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%