AIP Conference Proceedings 2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3099101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winds and Chromospheres of Cool (Super-) Giants

Abstract: We summarise the CS15 splinter session dealing with the winds and chromospheres of cool giant and supergiant stars. The motivation behind the session was to bring together various researchers in the field with the purpose of forming some important common goals for future work, as well as to hear some of the latest results. We provide an overview of the results that were presented and highlight some of the main outcomes of the discussions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as Airapetian et al (2010) point out, this simulation assumes fully-ionized plasma, although the gas around K-M giants is only weakly ionized. The MHD simulation of Airapetian et al (2010) reproduces the observed terminal wind velocities and mass-loss rates of K giants, but the agreement between the modeled and observed radial velocity fields is not yet satisfactory (a comparison of the model of Airapetian et al 2010 and the observed data summarized in Crowley et al 2009 is given in Harper 2011). Since the simulation of Airapetian et al (2010) assumes a nearly iso-thermal chromosphere, it does not include the cool, molecular component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as Airapetian et al (2010) point out, this simulation assumes fully-ionized plasma, although the gas around K-M giants is only weakly ionized. The MHD simulation of Airapetian et al (2010) reproduces the observed terminal wind velocities and mass-loss rates of K giants, but the agreement between the modeled and observed radial velocity fields is not yet satisfactory (a comparison of the model of Airapetian et al 2010 and the observed data summarized in Crowley et al 2009 is given in Harper 2011). Since the simulation of Airapetian et al (2010) assumes a nearly iso-thermal chromosphere, it does not include the cool, molecular component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%