Window-Shaping

Huang, Ke; Vinayak,; Ramani, Karthik

doi:10.1145/3024969.3024995

Cited by 33 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This approach can be used to author altered versions of it-an outcome similarly targeted by pARam, albeit through physical modifications. In an AR context, WindowShaping by Huo et al presented interactions to use real-world elements for a design process [44] and Han et al proposed methods to adapt AR interfaces to existing, real-world objects [38]. This approach is manifested in the estimation functions of pARam, where scanned aspects (e.g., the environment mesh) are used to support early evaluations and, by extension, design decisions.…”

Section: Design In and For Extended Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

Stemasov,

Demharter,

Rädler

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extended Reality (XR) allows in-situ previewing of designs to be manufactured through Personal Fabrication (PF). These in-situ interactions exhibit advantages for PF, like incorporating the environment into the design process. However, design-for-fabrication in XR often happens through either highly complex 3D-modeling or is reduced to rudimentary adaptations of crowd-sourced models. We present pARam, a tool combining parametric designs (PDs) and XR, enabling in-situ configuration of artifacts for PF. In contrast to modeling-or search-focused approaches, pARam supports customization through embodied and practical inputs (e.g., gestures, recommendations) and evaluation (e.g., lighting estimation) without demanding complex 3D-modeling skills. We implemented pARam for HoloLens 2 and evaluated it (𝑛 = 20), comparing XR and desktop conditions. Users succeeded in choosing context-related parameters and took their environment into account for their configuration using pARam. We reflect on the prospects and challenges of PDs in XR to streamline complex design methods for PF while retaining suitable expressivity. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Mixed / augmented reality; Interaction design.

show abstract

Section: Design In and For Extended Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal Fabrication

Stemasov,

Demharter,

Rädler

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Researchers have also explored in-situ and ad-hoc authoring experiences through immersive authoring [34,75,79]. VR has been a popular platform to support immersive authoring [60,80] with the advantage of allowing designers to explore scenarios free from temporal and spatial limitations [36,78].…”

Section: Prototyping For Xr Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

MineXR: Mining Personalized Extended Reality Interfaces

Cho,

Yan,

Todi

et al. 2024

Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extended Reality (XR) interfaces offer engaging user experiences, but their effective design requires a nuanced understanding of user behavior and preferences. This knowledge is challenging to obtain without the widespread adoption of XR devices. We introduce MineXR, a design mining workflow and data analysis platform for collecting and analyzing personalized XR user interaction and Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

show abstract

“…Most current Handheld AR systems use input on the touchscreen to interact with the virtual content, for example, to select and move items (e.g., [25,27,29]) or to sketch and model 3D objects by projecting touch drawings into the scene-either onto previously defined drawing planes [34] or onto tracked surfaces in the world [16]. However, specifying precise points in mid-air-such as to allow freehand sketching and drawing-is problematic since the input on the touchscreen is missing the 3rd dimension.…”

Section: Mid-air Interaction In Handheld Armentioning

confidence: 99%