2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03364.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Window‐period human immunodeficiency virus transmission to two recipients by an adolescent blood donor

Abstract: Pooled NAT of blood donations has not eliminated the window period for HIV identification during seroconversion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the use of MP-NAT, HIV was transmitted via window-stage donations at significant rates (5,22). Although very rarely, HIV has been transmitted by window period blood donations that were determined to have Յ150 vRNA copies/ml even after the adoption of MP-NAT (9,11,35,36). The occurrence of rare HIV transmission events by donations with no evidence of anti-HIV antibodies and very low vRNA levels is consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Prior to the use of MP-NAT, HIV was transmitted via window-stage donations at significant rates (5,22). Although very rarely, HIV has been transmitted by window period blood donations that were determined to have Յ150 vRNA copies/ml even after the adoption of MP-NAT (9,11,35,36). The occurrence of rare HIV transmission events by donations with no evidence of anti-HIV antibodies and very low vRNA levels is consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The authors state that the blood donation and transfusion of blood components occurred in Singapore, where blood donation testing for HIV is similar to US protocols, including anti-HIV-1 and anti-HIV-2 EIAs and an HIV-1 p24 antigen EIA (Ling et al 2000). In another report two infections were caused by a blood donation in 2002 (Phelps et al 2004). The donor was an adolescent repeat donor who tested HIV antibody positive in May 2002, and the previous donation (3 months earlier) must have been during the seronegative WP and at the eclipse of the virus too.…”
Section: Infectious Blood and Blood Products From Donors At The Seronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most blood donations are done commercially for economic gains, so that transfusion with an improperly screened blood remains a possibility. Despite these better blood screening procedures, HIV transmission may still occur if the blood donation occurred during the window period (when the blood of a newly infected person does not show up as positive on screening tests) [6][7][8], if the potential blood donor is infected with variant strains of HIV that may escape detection by current screening assays or following testing or documentation errors [7]. Almost all recipients of HIV-positive unit of blood/blood product will develop HIV-infection [8,9], and will manifest with symptoms of AIDS within a shorter incubation time especially in young children [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%