2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the time between failures is assumed to follow an exponential distribution, with the failure process being a homogeneous Poisson process (HPP) with a constant parameter, λ , representing the failure rate. This assumption has been tested and proven to be reasonable for the ReliaWind failure data and is widely accepted for WT reliability data studies …”
Section: Reliability Data Collection Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In both cases, the time between failures is assumed to follow an exponential distribution, with the failure process being a homogeneous Poisson process (HPP) with a constant parameter, λ , representing the failure rate. This assumption has been tested and proven to be reasonable for the ReliaWind failure data and is widely accepted for WT reliability data studies …”
Section: Reliability Data Collection Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the median values from Figure , subassemblies with the highest downtimes include Gearbox Generator Shafts and bearings Structure Subassemblies with lower downtimes in all surveys include Nacelle Sensor Hydraulics It is noted that there are similar types of box plots in Artigao et al compared with Figures and . However, the graphs in Artigao et al present normalised data in percentage, while Figures and present absolute failure rates and downtimes values, and thus can provide additional information such as the comparison of reliability data between different subassemblies. In addition, compared with Artigao et al there are more outliers in Figure , which can be explained by the use of absolute reliability data instead of normalised percentage reliability data.…”
Section: Wind Turbine Reliability Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations