Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on ReliefF-PCA and DNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core content of the ReliefF algorithm is the correlation between features and dataset class marks [37]. ReliefF algorithm randomly selects a sample R from the training set.…”
Section: Relieff Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core content of the ReliefF algorithm is the correlation between features and dataset class marks [37]. ReliefF algorithm randomly selects a sample R from the training set.…”
Section: Relieff Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q-learning algorithm is simple to implement and widely used, but it still faces the problem of dimensional disaster. The algorithm usually stores Q-values as tables and is not suitable for reinforcement learning problems in highdimensional or continuous state space [33].…”
Section: Dqn-based Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training using analog circuits for diagnostic models in fault diagnosis is more valuable. With the continuous refinement of various data-analysis methods, the troubleshooting technology for analog circuits is also improving; common troubleshooting techniques, including PCA [1], Search Grid [2], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [3], ant colony algorithm (ACA) [4], simulated annealing (SA) [5], genetic algorithm (GA) [6], Back Propagation Neural Network (BP) [6], Self-organizing Maps (SOM) [7], Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) [8], decision tree [9], random forest [10] and SVM [11] all have good classification results to some extent [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%