2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020wr028766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Tunnel Validation of a Particle Tracking Model to Evaluate the Wind‐Induced Bias of Precipitation Measurements

Abstract: The wind-induced undercatch of precipitation gauges is defined as the reduced amount of precipitation captured by the collector of the gauge with respect to the amount that would be captured if the gauge were transparent to the wind. When the gauge is exposed to the wind, airflow deformations occur above and upwind of the collector due to the bluff-body aerodynamics of the gauge outer geometry. Significant acceleration and vertical velocity components are generated (see e.g., Jevons, 1861;Warnik, 1953), induci… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gauge body, immersed in a wind field, behaves like a bluff-body obstacle to the undisturbed airflow, producing strong velocity gradients, vertical components, and the development of turbulence close to the gauge surface, see, e.g., [4,5]. The hydrometeor trajectories are diverted by the velocity field around the instrument [6] depending on their diameter, the gauge shape, wind speed, and wind direction. The induced change in the number of hydrometeors that cross the sensing volume/collecting area of the gauge (for NCGs and CGs, respectively) can lead, in windy conditions, to an over or under estimation of the precipitation amount and intensity (see, e.g., [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gauge body, immersed in a wind field, behaves like a bluff-body obstacle to the undisturbed airflow, producing strong velocity gradients, vertical components, and the development of turbulence close to the gauge surface, see, e.g., [4,5]. The hydrometeor trajectories are diverted by the velocity field around the instrument [6] depending on their diameter, the gauge shape, wind speed, and wind direction. The induced change in the number of hydrometeors that cross the sensing volume/collecting area of the gauge (for NCGs and CGs, respectively) can lead, in windy conditions, to an over or under estimation of the precipitation amount and intensity (see, e.g., [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resorting to a CFD modeling approach with embedded liquid and solid particle tracking algorithms allows simulating both the aerodynamic behavior of each instrument and the resulting collection performance. The approach, originally proposed by Nešpor and Sevruk (1999), and improved 2015) is described in Cauteruccio, Chinchella, et al (2021) for solid precipitation and in Cauteruccio et al (2021b) for liquid precipitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new model was added to the source code, with drag coefficient equations implemented for various ranges of the particle Reynolds number, as established a priori among those proposed in the literature by Folland (1988) and formulated starting from data published by Beard and Chuang (1987) and Khvorostyanov and Curry (2005). The model already adopted and validated in the work of Cauteruccio et al (2021b) is here slightly improved by modifying the Reynolds number intervals (changing the threshold value from 400 to 320) to adjust the continuity of the drag function over the entire range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cylindrical shape is typical of most tipping-bucket rain gauges that are employed operationally. Cauteruccio and Lanza (2020), based on the CFD velocity fields provided by Colli et al (2018), obtained the catch ratios of a typical cylindrical gauge using the Lagrangian Particle Tracking model already validated by Cauteruccio et al (2021a), and provided sample CE curves as a function of wind speed and rainfall intensity by using the PSD measured at an Italian test site by Caracciolo et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%